Control: severity -1 normal
On Thu, 18 Sep 2014 14:30:32 +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> > @Debian Kernel Maintainers: What would you recommend we add a
> > Recommends for ?
> Nothing. Reassign this to dkms (with lower severity) and let them
> handle it.
reassign + retitle have happened, doing t
On Saturday 20 September 2014 11:59 AM, YOSHINO Yoshihito wrote:
Control: tags -1 + patch
Hi,
>Do you know of the patch you were mentioning ? If it is a single patch, we
>may carry. But looking at the make-dfsg patches, it does not look so.
debian/patches/0003-read.c-record_files-SV-33034-Cha
This reply was for 732521. Sorry for the noise.
On Sat, Sep 20, 2014 at 3:29 PM, YOSHINO Yoshihito wrote:
> Control: tags -1 + patch
>
> Hi,
>
>> Do you know of the patch you were mentioning ? If it is a single patch, we
>> may carry. But looking at the make-dfsg patches, it does not look so.
>
>
On Sat, Sep 20, 2014 at 3:36 PM, YOSHINO Yoshihito wrote:
> Control: tags 762061 - patch
> Control: tags -1 + patch
>
> Oops, replied to a wrong bug.
>
> On Sat, Sep 20, 2014 at 3:29 PM, YOSHINO Yoshihito
> wrote:
>> Control: tags -1 + patch
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>>> Do you know of the patch you were men
Control: tags 762061 - patch
Control: tags -1 + patch
Oops, replied to a wrong bug.
On Sat, Sep 20, 2014 at 3:29 PM, YOSHINO Yoshihito wrote:
> Control: tags -1 + patch
>
> Hi,
>
>> Do you know of the patch you were mentioning ? If it is a single patch, we
>> may carry. But looking at the make-d
Control: tags -1 + patch
Hi,
> Do you know of the patch you were mentioning ? If it is a single patch, we
> may carry. But looking at the make-dfsg patches, it does not look so.
debian/patches/0003-read.c-record_files-SV-33034-Change-fatal-to-error.patch
in make-dfsg 4.0-8 contains the workaroun
On Thu, 2014-09-18 at 21:04 +0530, Ritesh Raj Sarraf wrote:
> Control: reassign -1 dkms
> Control: retitle -1 dkms should pull in the correct linux-headers package
>
>
> Thanks Ben. Omar: This bug is specific to dkms. That package should pull
> in the correct linux-headers package (based on the
Control: reassign -1 dkms
Control: retitle -1 dkms should pull in the correct linux-headers package
Thanks Ben. Omar: This bug is specific to dkms. That package should pull
in the correct linux-headers package (based on the architecture), which
is required to build the virtualbox-dkms package.
On Thu, 2014-09-18 at 13:18 +0530, Ritesh Raj Sarraf wrote:
[...]
> That said, I am using the same version on the same kernel, on my
> Debian box. My guess is that you do not have the relevant
> linux-headers package installed.
>
>
> @VBox Maintainers: I am seeing too many similar bug reports. P
Control: tag -1 +moreinfo
On Thursday 18 September 2014 08:27 AM, Omar Radwan wrote:
I recently got Debian installed on my laptop. Everything went smoothly,
except getting virtualbox to work was a nightmare. The virtualbox-dkms package
on Debian Testing, which at the moment is using lin
Package: virtualbox-dkms
Version: 4.3.14-dfsg-1
Severity: grave
Tags: upstream
Justification: renders package unusable
Dear Maintainer,
I recently got Debian installed on my laptop. Everything went smoothly,
except getting virtualbox to work was a nightmare. The virtualbox-dkms package
on
11 matches
Mail list logo