On 14-08-04 04:23 AM, Fabian Greffrath wrote:
> Am Sonntag, den 03.08.2014, 10:22 -0300 schrieb Jesse Smith:
>> Many people requested update checks be enabled by default and, as
>> there is no information sent about you and nothing logged, this cannot
>> be a privacy issue.
>
> In some way this c
Am Sonntag, den 03.08.2014, 10:22 -0300 schrieb Jesse Smith:
> Many people requested update checks be enabled by default and, as
> there is no information sent about you and nothing logged, this cannot
> be a privacy issue.
In some way this circumvents Debian's packaging system. On Debian
"stable
On 14-08-02 09:59 PM, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
> Jesse Smith (2014-08-02):
>> I am not sure why you would want to disable update notification.
>
> I'd call it basic privacy.
>
How is checking for updates a privacy issue? No information about you
or your computer or even your installation of Atank
Jesse Smith (2014-08-02):
> I am not sure why you would want to disable update notification.
I'd call it basic privacy.
> Especially with a patch to the source code, that seems overkill. If the
> message bothers you you could just disable update notifications in the
> Options menu under the Netw
On 14-08-02 09:13 PM, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
> Package: atanks
> Version: 5.5+dfsg-0.1
> Severity: important
>
> Hi,
>
> just noticed when exiting atanks:
> | A new version, 6.0, is ready for download.
> | See http://atanks.sourceforge.net for the latest news and downloads.
>
> The code seems to
Package: atanks
Version: 5.5+dfsg-0.1
Severity: important
Hi,
just noticed when exiting atanks:
| A new version, 6.0, is ready for download.
| See http://atanks.sourceforge.net for the latest news and downloads.
The code seems to live in src/update.cpp's Get_Latest_Version(), and I'd
suggest pat
6 matches
Mail list logo
