> However, when thinking about, users might be used to call raxmlHPC
> and thus the wrapper should get this name and we could throw away the
> result of Makefile.gcc. Is this correct or not?
Sounds about right.
> Is there any possibility that the vanilla raxmlHPC might be used
> under some circu
[Robert, sorry for the long silence to bug #729537. While we now have
more recent versions of RAxML in Debian the sse3-pthreads hint of yours
was not regarded but may be since this is now on the table you might
like to have some word about it as well.]
Hi,
I tried to implement Elmar's hint abou
Package: raxml
Version: 7.2.8-2
Severity: wishlist
Dear Maintainer,
the current RAxML package contains only the "vanilla" version of RAxML
compiled without support threading or SIMD. Given that typical use cases
of RAxML require days of computation, enabling parallel processing would
improve the
3 matches
Mail list logo
