Hi,
On Wed, Aug 27, 2014 at 05:25:45PM +0200, Thomas Schmitt wrote:
> Hi,
>
> i am still riddling how to recognize an autotools version
> which suffices for ppc64el.
>
> Would it be possible to get to see such a regenerated
> ./configure from ppc64el ?
The way to know that is to look if you hav
Hi,
i am still riddling how to recognize an autotools version
which suffices for ppc64el.
Would it be possible to get to see such a regenerated
./configure from ppc64el ?
Have a nice day :)
Thomas
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsub
Hi,
Aurelien Jarno wrote:
> From the upstream point of view,
> you might want to release the next version with the autoconf related
> files regenerated with a relatively recent version of autoconf,
> automake and libtool.
That's not without problems on my workstation. I will look whether
i can u
On Mon, Aug 25, 2014 at 08:23:20AM +0200, Thomas Schmitt wrote:
> Hi,
Hi,
> i am the upstream programmer.
>
> > Don't hesitate to ask questions if you need help to fix this bug.
>
> Can it be that the linker of that ppc64el installation is insufficient ?
>
> I diffed the build logs of ppc64el
Hi,
i am the upstream programmer.
> Don't hesitate to ask questions if you need help to fix this bug.
Can it be that the linker of that ppc64el installation is insufficient ?
I diffed the build logs of ppc64el and i386. These are suspicious:
< checking whether the gcc linker (/usr/bin/ld -m el
Dear maintainer,
The ppc64el architecture has been added to the Debian archive. Your
package libburn fails to build as reported in bug #753421 and
the build log is available on [1].
It would be very nice if you can upload a fixed version of this package.
Don't hesitate to ask questions if you nee
6 matches
Mail list logo
