Bug#753168: xfce4-mailwatch-plugin: Please build against libgnutls28-dev

2014-09-06 Thread Andreas Metzler
On 2014-08-25 Andreas Metzler wrote: [...] > Well, I am not using xfce and afaict these plugins cannot be tested on > their own. I somehow hoped that at least one of the uploaders would be > able and willing to test the functionality of the rebuilt package. I have installed xfce to test this. It

Bug#753168: xfce4-mailwatch-plugin: Please build against libgnutls28-dev

2014-08-25 Thread Andreas Metzler
On 2014-08-24 Yves-Alexis Perez wrote: > On dim., 2014-08-24 at 14:58 +0200, Andreas Metzler wrote: >> just to reconfirm: xfce4-mailwatch-plugin builds successful with the >> attached trivial patch (just updating build-dependecies). Could you >> please test whether the generated binary works and u

Bug#753168: [Pkg-xfce-devel] Bug#753168: xfce4-mailwatch-plugin: Please build against libgnutls28-dev

2014-08-24 Thread Yves-Alexis Perez
On dim., 2014-08-24 at 14:58 +0200, Andreas Metzler wrote: > just to reconfirm: xfce4-mailwatch-plugin builds successful with the > attached trivial patch (just updating build-dependecies). Could you > please test whether the generated binary works and upload? We're more interested in actual usabi

Bug#753168: xfce4-mailwatch-plugin: Please build against libgnutls28-dev

2014-08-24 Thread Andreas Metzler
Control: -1 patch Control: -1 moreinfo On 2014-07-01 Andreas Metzler wrote: [...] > It is mostly API compatible, in my tests xfce4-mailwatch-plugin > *built* successfuly against libgnutls28-dev (I had to manuall install > libgcrypt20-dev), no idea whether it works, though. [...] Hello, just to

Bug#753168: xfce4-mailwatch-plugin: Please build against libgnutls28-dev

2014-07-02 Thread Andreas Metzler
On 2014-07-01 Andreas Metzler wrote: > different, needing to use gnutls_global_set_mutex(). See for an > example. ... here: http://www.openldap.org/its/?findid=7877 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas..

Bug#753168: xfce4-mailwatch-plugin: Please build against libgnutls28-dev

2014-07-01 Thread Andreas Metzler
On 2014-06-30 Yves-Alexis Perez wrote: [...] > > Please build xfce4-mailwatch-plugin against libgnutls28-dev (and possibly > > libgcrypt20-dev while you are at it) instead of libgnutls-dev, the > > older GnuTLS version should not be part of jessie. > Unfortunately, it seems that gnutls20 is not

Bug#753168: [Pkg-xfce-devel] Bug#753168: xfce4-mailwatch-plugin: Please build against libgnutls28-dev

2014-06-30 Thread Yves-Alexis Perez
On dim., 2014-06-29 at 19:28 +0200, Andreas Metzler wrote: > Package: xfce4-mailwatch-plugin > Version: 1.2.0-1 > Severity: normal > User: ametz...@debian.org > Usertags: gnutls3 > > Hello, > > Please build xfce4-mailwatch-plugin against libgnutls28-dev (and possibly > libgcrypt20-dev while you a

Bug#753168: [Pkg-xfce-devel] Bug#753168: xfce4-mailwatch-plugin: Please build against libgnutls28-dev

2014-06-30 Thread Andreas Metzler
On 2014-06-29 Yves-Alexis Perez wrote: [...] > Well, I'd say the whole point of using the unversionned -dev package > would be to let the maintainers handle the transition themselves. I'm ok > with updating the build-dep, but does it means the unversionned -dev > package will be gone? Hello, It i

Bug#753168: [Pkg-xfce-devel] Bug#753168: xfce4-mailwatch-plugin: Please build against libgnutls28-dev

2014-06-29 Thread Yves-Alexis Perez
On dim., 2014-06-29 at 19:28 +0200, Andreas Metzler wrote: > Package: xfce4-mailwatch-plugin > Version: 1.2.0-1 > Severity: normal > User: ametz...@debian.org > Usertags: gnutls3 > > Hello, > > Please build xfce4-mailwatch-plugin against libgnutls28-dev (and possibly > libgcrypt20-dev while you a

Bug#753168: xfce4-mailwatch-plugin: Please build against libgnutls28-dev

2014-06-29 Thread Andreas Metzler
Package: xfce4-mailwatch-plugin Version: 1.2.0-1 Severity: normal User: ametz...@debian.org Usertags: gnutls3 Hello, Please build xfce4-mailwatch-plugin against libgnutls28-dev (and possibly libgcrypt20-dev while you are at it) instead of libgnutls-dev, the older GnuTLS version should not be part