❦ 16 mars 2015 15:45 +0100, Holger Levsen :
>> > maybe it would be more appropriate to properly orphan the package
>> > then?
>> I'll do that then. I thought this was not appropriate for
>> team-maintained packages.
>
> I think it totally is: obviously this should be discussed in the team first
Hi Vincent,
On Sonntag, 15. März 2015, Vincent Bernat wrote:
> > maybe it would be more appropriate to properly orphan the package
> > then?
> I'll do that then. I thought this was not appropriate for
> team-maintained packages.
I think it totally is: obviously this should be discussed in the tea
❦ 15 mars 2015 15:50 +0100, Holger Levsen :
>> The point is that the package is team maintained but none of the
>> maintainers have time to do anything.
>
> maybe it would be more appropriate to properly orphan the package
> then?
I'll do that then. I thought this was not appropriate for
team-m
Hi Vincent,
On Samstag, 14. März 2015, Vincent Bernat wrote:
> The point is that the package is team maintained but none of the
> maintainers have time to do anything.
maybe it would be more appropriate to properly orphan the package then?
> Whoever has some upgrade plan, even one where the user
Control: tags -1 + help
❦ 19 février 2015 17:55 +0100, Holger Levsen :
> I'm using the 1.0.5 packages from
> https://launchpad.net/~tuxpoldo/+archive/ubuntu/roundcube
> succesfully, but also noted that upstream has now released version 1.1.
>
> http://roundcube.net/news/2015/02/08/new-stable-v
control: retitle -1 please package upstream version 1.0 (important security
fixes)
Hi,
I'm using the 1.0.5 packages from
https://launchpad.net/~tuxpoldo/+archive/ubuntu/roundcube
succesfully, but also noted that upstream has now released version 1.1.
http://roundcube.net/news/2015/02/08/new-st
6 matches
Mail list logo