Hi Ivo,
On Sat, Nov 29, 2014 at 8:26 PM, Ivo De Decker wrote:
>
> But the packages currently in testing can be installed with the old blt
> version, which doesn't work.
Well, the concern is about the packages which are currently in wheezy
and depend on blt (>= 2.4). They can be installed with bl
Hi,
On Sat, Nov 15, 2014 at 02:37:43PM +0400, Sergei Golovan wrote:
> On Sat, Nov 15, 2014 at 12:50 PM, Julien Cristau wrote:
> >>
> > You can't keep a dummy package on SONAME changes, since it doesn't
> > actually provide the ABI older versions of its rdeps expect.
>
> I've added 'Breaks' heade
On Sun, Nov 16, 2014 at 6:20 PM, Jonathan Wiltshire wrote:
>
> That presumably makes this package undistributable, or have I
> misunderstood?
Yes, I think so as well. Fortunately, these files aren't important for
the BLT library at all. In fact, I've found only one piece of software
which ever us
On Fri, Nov 14, 2014 at 11:46:14AM -0600, Sergei Golovan wrote:
> On the other hand, I've reviewed the licenses for the source codes and
> found a few
> disturbing files. They are library/dd_protocols/*.tcl (I've attached
> one of them here).
> The copyright statement stands: Copyright (c) 1993 AT
On Sat, Nov 15, 2014 at 12:50 PM, Julien Cristau wrote:
>>
> You can't keep a dummy package on SONAME changes, since it doesn't
> actually provide the ABI older versions of its rdeps expect.
I've added 'Breaks' header for all packages that depended on the older
library. Specifically it is:
Break
On Fri, Nov 14, 2014 at 11:46:14 -0600, Sergei Golovan wrote:
> Hi!
>
> On Sun, Nov 2, 2014 at 8:05 AM, Julien Cristau wrote:
> > On Sun, Nov 2, 2014 at 13:58:10 +, Simon McVittie wrote:
> >>
> >> Hello release team,
> >> Since this is going to be a transition, and a new upstream SONAME for
Hi!
On Sun, Nov 2, 2014 at 8:05 AM, Julien Cristau wrote:
> On Sun, Nov 2, 2014 at 13:58:10 +, Simon McVittie wrote:
>>
>> Hello release team,
>> Since this is going to be a transition, and a new upstream SONAME for
>> jessie seems unlikely, should this bug be jessie-ignore'd
>> and fixed fo
On Mon, 11 Aug 2014 at 15:46:28 +0300, Sergei Golovan wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 11, 2014 at 2:07 AM, peter green wrote:
> > That only partially solves the problem, in particular partial upgrades are
> > still likely to break. Furthermore the problem will recur next time libBLT
> > changes it's soname.
On Sun, Nov 2, 2014 at 13:58:10 +, Simon McVittie wrote:
> On Mon, 11 Aug 2014 at 15:46:28 +0300, Sergei Golovan wrote:
> > On Mon, Aug 11, 2014 at 2:07 AM, peter green wrote:
> > > That only partially solves the problem, in particular partial upgrades are
> > > still likely to break. Furthe
Hi Peter,
On Mon, Aug 11, 2014 at 2:07 AM, peter green wrote:
>
> That only partially solves the problem, in particular partial upgrades are
> still likely to break. Furthermore the problem will recur next time libBLT
> changes it's soname.
I don't expect changing its soname in next few years (o
Reopen 751767
Thanks.
As for now all the reverse dependencies of blt have been updated to
use Tcl/Tk 8.6 and BLT 2.5, so I'm closing the bug.
That only partially solves the problem, in particular partial upgrades
are still likely to break. Furthermore the problem will recur next time
libBLT
11 matches
Mail list logo
