Privet
Spacibo.
I have looked a little more into the patch. I see that it is a way to
allocate a dynamic size array. Is there any specific reason why clang does
not support this way of writing? I mean the code is really much neater when
written the way it is instead of the quite lengthy update yo
Hi Ola,
This patch has been made as a part of the "Debian with Clang" project. The
main purpose of this is to be able to compile full Debian OS with Clang.
You can find more information here: http://clang.debian.net/
2014-06-10 14:04 GMT+04:00 Ola Lundqvist :
> Hi
>
> Thanks for the report. I'm
Hi
Thanks for the report. I'm a bit reluctant to apply this myself. I would
like upstream to do this.
What is the motivation to support clang compiler?
// Ola
On Sun, Jun 1, 2014 at 9:32 PM, Alexander Ovchinnikov
wrote:
> Package: steghide
> Severity: minor
> Tags: patch
> User: pkg-llvm-t...
Package: steghide
Severity: minor
Tags: patch
User: pkg-llvm-t...@lists.alioth.debian.org
Usertags: clang-ftbfs
Hello,
Using the rebuild infrastructure, your package fails to build with clang
(instead of gcc).
See build logs here:
http://clang.debian.net/logs/2014-01-14/steghide_0.5.1-9_unstabl
4 matches
Mail list logo
