Bug#749321: Poor transition path

2015-02-14 Thread Elena ``of Valhalla''
On 2015-02-14 at 19:45:39 +0100, Luciano Bello wrote: > [...] > Some clarifications: > - The python-pypdf packages did not migrated to PyPDF2. PyPDF2 is a fully > independent package: python-pypdf2. Maybe I'm understanding something wrong, > I > don't know what Elena means with https://bugs.deb

Bug#749321: Poor transition path

2015-02-14 Thread Luciano Bello
On Sat, 27 Sep 2014 14:07:18 +0200 =?UTF-8?B?SmVyZW15IExhaW7DqQ==?= wrote: > I think the transition to pypdf2 was handled rather poorly. This issue manage to make the way up in my ToDo list this week, after way too much time. I'm sorry for the long delay. Since I'm a bit out-of-sync here, I wi

Bug#749321: Poor transition path

2014-09-27 Thread Jeremy Lainé
I think the transition to pypdf2 was handled rather poorly. The module name is different, so I would expect a python-pypdf2 package instead of a misleading python-pypdf .. which does not contain a "pypdf" module. What I would suggest: - add a new python-pypdf2 package - if we really want to stop