Bug#749136: jellyfish: FTBFS with clang instead of gcc

El 09/10/14 a les 13:16, Andreas Tille ha escrit: Thanks a lot for your work on this Always a pleasure working with you guys :-) Martin -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Bug#749136: jellyfish: FTBFS with clang instead of gcc

Hi Martin, On Wed, Oct 08, 2014 at 11:28:55PM +0200, Martin Steghöfer wrote: > > Btw. I think you're missing the tag "upstream/2.1.4" in order to make > git-buildpackage build it without complaints. Yes, I forgot to `git push --tags`, sorry. > You can just append a suffix ".patch" to the URLs

Bug#749136: jellyfish: FTBFS with clang instead of gcc

Hi Andreas! El 08/10/14 a les 21:06, Andreas Tille ha escrit: Would you volunteer to check the current Git repository regarding the clang issue? It's not ready yet but the state is good enough to look into the clang build. The current state of the package in Debian-Med's git repository has t

Bug#749136: jellyfish: FTBFS with clang instead of gcc

Hi Martin, On Wed, Oct 08, 2014 at 06:24:35PM +0200, Martin Steghöfer wrote: > El 04/10/14 a les 19:41, Andreas Tille ha escrit: > >In the case of Jellyfish I guess > >the best thing is to migrate to latest upstream version. > > That sounds like a good idea in general. It won't solve the clang >

Bug#749136: jellyfish: FTBFS with clang instead of gcc

Hi Andreas! El 04/10/14 a les 19:41, Andreas Tille ha escrit: In the case of Jellyfish I guess the best thing is to migrate to latest upstream version. That sounds like a good idea in general. It won't solve the clang issue, though. I commited the packaging to Git - however, it needs h

Bug#749136: jellyfish: FTBFS with clang instead of gcc

Hi Martin, thanks a lot for your QA work. In the case of Jellyfish I guess the best thing is to migrate to latest upstream version. I commited the packaging to Git - however, it needs https://github.com/gmarcais/yaggo which needs to be packaged first. No idea whether we get it to pass new ri

Bug#749136: jellyfish: FTBFS with clang instead of gcc

Hi all, I can confirm that the build fails with clang 3.4 and that the patch sent by Alexander fixes the problem. The most recent version of clang (3.5), however, compiles the package fine without any patches. This is because Clang has extended its detection of constant values and is now abl

Bug#749136: jellyfish: FTBFS with clang instead of gcc

Package: jellyfish Severity: minor Tags: patch User: pkg-llvm-t...@lists.alioth.debian.org Usertags: clang-ftbfs Hello, Using the rebuild infrastructure, your package fails to build with clang (instead of gcc). See build logs here: http://clang.debian.net/logs/2014-01-14/jellyfish_1.1.10-1_unst