On 07/09/14 14:11, Andreas Metzler wrote:
> On 2014-08-31 Andreas Metzler wrote:
>> On 2014-08-03 Andreas Metzler wrote:
> [...]
>> almost the final ones:
>
> Hello,
> This seems to be the final one for some time:
>
> nmu git-annex 5.20140831 . ALL . -m 'Rebuild against gnutls28'
Scheduled.
E
On 2014-08-31 Andreas Metzler wrote:
> On 2014-08-03 Andreas Metzler wrote:
[...]
> almost the final ones:
Hello,
This seems to be the final one for some time:
nmu git-annex 5.20140831 . ALL . -m 'Rebuild against gnutls28'
The transition seems to be almost done, there are just 7 relevant
sourc
On 31/08/14 16:26, Andreas Metzler wrote:
> On 2014-08-03 Andreas Metzler wrote:
> [...]
>> nmu libccrtp_2.0.9-2 . ALL . -m 'Rebuild against gnutls28'
>
> almost the final ones:
>
> nmu gtklp_1.2.7-2.3 . ALL . -m 'Rebuild against gnutls28'
Not done as you said.
> nmu samhain_3.1.0-6 . ALL . -m
On 2014-08-31 Andreas Metzler wrote:
[...]
> nmu gtklp_1.2.7-2.3 . ALL . -m 'Rebuild against gnutls28'
Nevermind about this one, it is only in sid and has an open FTBFS bug.
cu Andreas
--
`What a good friend you are to him, Dr. Maturin. His other friends are
so grateful to you.'
`I sew his ear
On 2014-08-03 Andreas Metzler wrote:
[...]
> nmu libccrtp_2.0.9-2 . ALL . -m 'Rebuild against gnutls28'
almost the final ones:
nmu gtklp_1.2.7-2.3 . ALL . -m 'Rebuild against gnutls28'
nmu samhain_3.1.0-6 . ALL . -m 'Rebuild against gnutls28'
nmu suricata_2.0.3-1 . ALL . -m 'Rebuild against gnut
On 03/08/14 19:39, Andreas Metzler wrote:
> On 2014-07-18 Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
>>> On 17/07/14 18:33, Andreas Metzler wrote:
nmu xbmc_2:13.1~rc1+dfsg1-1 . ALL . -m 'Rebuild against gnutls28'
>
>> That one failed everywhere. I have opened a serious bug for it.
>
> Hello,
>
> I just
On 03/08/14 19:14, Andreas Metzler wrote:
> On 2014-07-17 Andreas Metzler wrote:
>> On 2014-07-12 Andreas Metzler wrote:
there is another binnmu candidate:
>> [...]
>
>> some new ones:
> [...]
>
> and more:
>
> nmu sipwitch_1.6.1-1 . ALL . -m 'Rebuild against gnutls28'
> nmu libccaudio2_2
On 2014-07-18 Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
> > On 17/07/14 18:33, Andreas Metzler wrote:
> >> nmu xbmc_2:13.1~rc1+dfsg1-1 . ALL . -m 'Rebuild against gnutls28'
> That one failed everywhere. I have opened a serious bug for it.
Hello,
I just had a successful local build, could you please retry?
On 2014-07-17 Andreas Metzler wrote:
> On 2014-07-12 Andreas Metzler wrote:
> >> there is another binnmu candidate:
> [...]
> some new ones:
[...]
and more:
nmu sipwitch_1.6.1-1 . ALL . -m 'Rebuild against gnutls28'
nmu libccaudio2_2.1.3-1 . ALL . -m 'Rebuild against gnutls28'
nmu libccrtp_2.0
> On 17/07/14 18:33, Andreas Metzler wrote:
>> nmu xbmc_2:13.1~rc1+dfsg1-1 . ALL . -m 'Rebuild against gnutls28'
That one failed everywhere. I have opened a serious bug for it.
Emilio
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble
On 17/07/14 18:33, Andreas Metzler wrote:
> nmu gobby-infinote_0.4.94-6 . ALL . -m 'Rebuild against gnutls28'
> nmu pycurl_7.19.3.1-1 . ALL . -m 'Rebuild against gnutls28'
> nmu xbmc_2:13.1~rc1+dfsg1-1 . ALL . -m 'Rebuild against gnutls28'
Scheduled.
Emilio
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-b
On 2014-07-12 Andreas Metzler wrote:
>> there is another binnmu candidate:
[...]
some new ones:
nmu gobby-infinote_0.4.94-6 . ALL . -m 'Rebuild against gnutls28'
nmu pycurl_7.19.3.1-1 . ALL . -m 'Rebuild against gnutls28'
nmu xbmc_2:13.1~rc1+dfsg1-1 . ALL . -m 'Rebuild against gnutls28'
TIA.
c
On 12/07/14 09:34, Andreas Metzler wrote:
> On 2014-07-12 Andreas Metzler wrote:
>> Good morning,
>
>> there is another binnmu candidate:
>
>> nmu cadaver_0.23.3-2 . ALL . -m 'Rebuild against gnutls28'
> [...]
>
> actually there is a second one:
> nmu libaqbanking_5.4.3beta-2 . ALL . -m 'Rebuil
On 2014-07-12 Andreas Metzler wrote:
> Good morning,
> there is another binnmu candidate:
> nmu cadaver_0.23.3-2 . ALL . -m 'Rebuild against gnutls28'
[...]
actually there is a second one:
nmu libaqbanking_5.4.3beta-2 . ALL . -m 'Rebuild against gnutls28'
cu Andreas
--
`What a good friend you
Good morning,
there is another binnmu candidate:
nmu cadaver 0.23.3-2 . ALL . -m 'Rebuild against gnutls28'
Cadaver does not build-depend directly on gnutls by inherits the
build-dependency from neon27, which was upgraded to gnutls28 and has
propagated to testing.
I could not find any other can
On 21/06/14 13:28, Andreas Metzler wrote:
> nmu libnet-cups-perl_0.61-2 ALL . -m 'Rebuild to drop libgnutls26 dependency'
> nmu newsbeuter_2.7-1 ALL . -m 'Rebuild to drop libgnutls26 dependency'
> nmu xpp_1.5-cvs20081009-1 ALL . -m 'Rebuild to drop libgnutls26 dependency'
Scheduled. BTW there i
On 2014-06-17 Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
[...]
> https://release.debian.org/transitions/html/gnutls28.html
[...]
These packages lose their gnutls dependency on a rebuild:
nmu libnet-cups-perl_0.61-2 ALL . -m 'Rebuild to drop libgnutls26 dependency'
nmu newsbeuter_2.7-1 ALL . -m 'Rebuild to
On 2014-06-17 Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
[...]
> BTW there are currently some issues with the gcrypt transition, see e.g.:
> https://buildd.debian.org/status/package.php?p=pycurl
> Are you aware of that? Not sure if that's part of the gnutls
> transition or if we should have another bug for t
Control: forwarded -1 https://release.debian.org/transitions/html/gnutls28.html
On 16/06/14 19:07, Andreas Metzler wrote:
> On 2014-06-16 Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
>> On 15/06/14 19:20, Andreas Metzler wrote:
> [...]
>>> Actually I was wrong, it simply propagated, since libetpan/testing is
>
On 2014-06-16 Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
> On 15/06/14 19:20, Andreas Metzler wrote:
[...]
> > Actually I was wrong, it simply propagated, since libetpan/testing is
> > using libgnutls26. :-)
> Yep, it is done now.
> Do you want a tracker for the gnutls26 -> gnutls28 transition as per your
>
On 15/06/14 19:20, Andreas Metzler wrote:
> On 2014-06-15 Andreas Metzler wrote:
>> On 2014-06-10 Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
>>> On 06/06/14 20:30, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
> [...]
>>> Looks like libgadu and wireshark are the only remaining problems.
>
>> Good morning,
>
>> Which would
On 2014-06-15 Andreas Metzler wrote:
> On 2014-06-10 Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
> > On 06/06/14 20:30, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
[...]
>> Looks like libgadu and wireshark are the only remaining problems.
> Good morning,
> Which would both be solved now. However afaict the dependency circ
On 2014-06-10 Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
> On 06/06/14 20:30, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
>> Ah, good point! libgadu seems to be the only problem so far (it
>> was failing on kbsd and didn't migrate because of that. I have
>> retried it and it failed again).
> Looks like libgadu and wireshar
On 06/06/14 20:30, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
> Ah, good point! libgadu seems to be the only problem so far (it was failing on
> kbsd and didn't migrate because of that. I have retried it and it failed
> again).
Looks like libgadu and wireshark are the only remaining problems.
Emilio
--
To
On 06/06/14 19:39, Andreas Metzler wrote:
> On 2014-06-06 Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
>> On 05/06/14 20:08, Andreas Metzler wrote:
>>> On 2014-06-05 Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
> [...]
I was going to ack this, but I see gnutls/exp failed on kbsd-i386.
>
> Just for the archives: I canno
On 2014-06-06 Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
> On 05/06/14 20:08, Andreas Metzler wrote:
>> On 2014-06-05 Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
[...]
>>> I was going to ack this, but I see gnutls/exp failed on kbsd-i386.
Just for the archives: I cannot reproduce the error with 3.3 on
fisher.
[...]
>> I
On 05/06/14 20:08, Andreas Metzler wrote:
> On 2014-06-05 Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
>> On 29/05/14 08:09, Andreas Metzler wrote:
> [...]
>>> Okay. So I have got gnutls28 (3.2.14-2) ready for upload (except for
>>> dch -r) If you want to take a look at it the package is available on
>>> people.
On 2014-06-05 Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
> On 29/05/14 08:09, Andreas Metzler wrote:
[...]
>> Okay. So I have got gnutls28 (3.2.14-2) ready for upload (except for
>> dch -r) If you want to take a look at it the package is available on
>> people.debian.org in ~ametzler/GNUTLS/. (debdiff is also
Control: tags -1 confirmed
On 29/05/14 08:09, Andreas Metzler wrote:
> On 2014-05-26 Julien Cristau wrote:
>> On Mon, May 26, 2014 at 20:29:18 +0200, Andreas Metzler wrote:
>
>>> So now we need a libgnutls28 -> libgnutls-deb0-28 transition as a
>>> first step. - How should I go about this, shoul
On 2014-05-26 Julien Cristau wrote:
> On Mon, May 26, 2014 at 20:29:18 +0200, Andreas Metzler wrote:
>> So now we need a libgnutls28 -> libgnutls-deb0-28 transition as a
>> first step. - How should I go about this, should a open a separate new
>> transition bug report?
> I think we can use this
On Mon, May 26, 2014 at 20:29:18 +0200, Andreas Metzler wrote:
> So now we need a libgnutls28 -> libgnutls-deb0-28 transition as a
> first step. - How should I go about this, should a open a separate new
> transition bug report?
>
I think we can use this one.
Cheers,
Julien
signature.asc
Descr
On 2014-05-24 Julien Cristau wrote:
> On Sat, May 24, 2014 at 15:21:12 +0200, Andreas Metzler wrote:
[...]
>> i.e. the library packge name would change to libgnutls-deb0-28. - Any
>> thoughts about it?
> Looks reasonable to me. Thanks!
Hello,
I had uploaded changed packages to experimental on
On Sat, May 24, 2014 at 15:21:12 +0200, Andreas Metzler wrote:
> On 2014-05-24 Andreas Metzler wrote:
> [...]
> > So we would need to change the binary package name and do a soname bump,
> > correct?
> [...]
>
> Hello,
> Which I would do with attached patch, which causes this:
>
On 2014-05-24 Andreas Metzler wrote:
[...]
> So we would need to change the binary package name and do a soname bump,
> correct?
[...]
Hello,
Which I would do with attached patch, which causes this:
(SID)ametzler@argenau:/tmp/GNUTLS/gnutls-3.2.14/debian/tmp/usr/lib/i386-linux-gnu
On 2014-05-20 Julien Cristau wrote:
> On Tue, May 20, 2014 at 19:47:48 +0200, Andreas Metzler wrote:
[...]
>> Afaik it is not possible to change the versioning scheme and move from
>> soname.1 foo@0 bar@1 baz@1
>> to
>> soname.1 foo@1 bar@1 baz@1
>> without breaking the ABI, is it?
> Yep.
So w
On 20/05/14 19:47, Andreas Metzler wrote:
> On 2014-05-20 Julien Cristau wrote:
>> On Mon, May 19, 2014 at 19:04:43 +0200, Julien Cristau wrote:
>>> On Sun, May 18, 2014 at 08:52:53 +0200, Andreas Metzler wrote:
> [...]
>>> Apparently loading both versions of gnutls in the same process leads to
>
Hello!
On Tue, May 20, 2014 at 08:02:22PM +0200, Julien Cristau wrote:
> On Tue, May 20, 2014 at 19:47:48 +0200, Andreas Metzler wrote:
>
> > On 2014-05-20 Julien Cristau wrote:
> > > On Mon, May 19, 2014 at 19:04:43 +0200, Julien Cristau wrote:
> > > > On Sun, May 18, 2014 at 08:52:53 +0200, An
On Tue, May 20, 2014 at 19:47:48 +0200, Andreas Metzler wrote:
> On 2014-05-20 Julien Cristau wrote:
> > On Mon, May 19, 2014 at 19:04:43 +0200, Julien Cristau wrote:
> > > On Sun, May 18, 2014 at 08:52:53 +0200, Andreas Metzler wrote:
> [...]
> > > Apparently loading both versions of gnutls in
On 2014-05-20 Julien Cristau wrote:
> On Mon, May 19, 2014 at 19:04:43 +0200, Julien Cristau wrote:
> > On Sun, May 18, 2014 at 08:52:53 +0200, Andreas Metzler wrote:
[...]
> > Apparently loading both versions of gnutls in the same process leads to
> > crashes. That screams at bugs in gnutls sym
On Mon, May 19, 2014 at 19:04:43 +0200, Julien Cristau wrote:
> On Sun, May 18, 2014 at 08:52:53 +0200, Andreas Metzler wrote:
>
> > Package: release.debian.org
> > Severity: normal
> > User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
> > Usertags: transition
> >
> > Hello,
> >
> > I would like to
On 2014-05-19 Julien Cristau wrote:
> On Sun, May 18, 2014 at 08:52:53 +0200, Andreas Metzler wrote:
[...]
>> I would like to ship jessie without GnuTLS 2.x (gnutls26) as it is
>> dead upstream and _old_. The last upstream release was in February
>> 2013, marking the end of a multi-year series of
On Sun, May 18, 2014 at 08:52:53 +0200, Andreas Metzler wrote:
> Package: release.debian.org
> Severity: normal
> User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
> Usertags: transition
>
> Hello,
>
> I would like to ship jessie without GnuTLS 2.x (gnutls26) as it is
> dead upstream and _old_. The l
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: transition
Hello,
I would like to ship jessie without GnuTLS 2.x (gnutls26) as it is
dead upstream and _old_. The last upstream release was in February
2013, marking the end of a multi-year series
43 matches
Mail list logo
