On Sat, Aug 09, 2014 at 10:15:34PM -0300, Antonio Terceiro wrote:
> I am working on a solution for this; I have added an entry for a minimum
> ruby dependency together with the existing data about interpreters to
> ruby-all-dev¹, committed a change that drops the dependency looo², and
> will modify
On Mon, Jul 28, 2014 at 07:41:33PM +0200, Francesco Poli wrote:
> On Sun, 27 Jul 2014 01:57:22 +0200 Christian Hofstaedtler wrote:
>
> > Re: ruby-debian no longer supporting ruby2.0, but apt-listbugs runs
> > with 2.0 during a partial upgrade
> >
> > Given your description it would appear that al
On Sun, 27 Jul 2014 01:57:22 +0200 Christian Hofstaedtler wrote:
> Re: ruby-debian no longer supporting ruby2.0, but apt-listbugs runs
> with 2.0 during a partial upgrade
>
> Given your description it would appear that all ruby packages would
> need to gain explicit rubyX.Y dependencies (similar
Re: ruby-debian no longer supporting ruby2.0, but apt-listbugs runs
with 2.0 during a partial upgrade
Given your description it would appear that all ruby packages would
need to gain explicit rubyX.Y dependencies (similar to how this
works for the Python packages).
As an alternative, ruby-debian
On Mon, 12 May 2014 13:02:12 +0200 Bill Allombert wrote:
> Package: libruby2.1
> Version: 2.1.2-1
> Severity: important
>
> Hello Antonio,
>
> There is a circular dependency between libruby2.1, ruby and ruby2.1:
>
> libruby2.1:Depends: ruby2.1 (= 2.1.2-1)
> ruby :Depends: ruby2.1
>
Package: libruby2.1
Version: 2.1.2-1
Severity: important
Hello Antonio,
There is a circular dependency between libruby2.1, ruby and ruby2.1:
libruby2.1 :Depends: ruby2.1 (= 2.1.2-1)
ruby:Depends: ruby2.1
ruby2.1 :Depends: ruby (>= 1:1.9.3.1), libruby2.1 (>= 2.1.0)
Compl
6 matches
Mail list logo
