Bug#747270: [Python-modules-team] Bug#747270: Bug#747270: python-librabbitmq

2014-08-09 Thread Brian May
On 10 August 2014 01:12, Michael Fladischer wrote: > You are right. I'm preparing a new kombu upload right now, that will > have python-librabbitmq (>= 1.5.2) as a Recommends. [...] > I also prepared an upload for librabbitmq-0.5.0 which will then close > this bug. I also tested python-librab

Bug#747270: [Python-modules-team] Bug#747270: Bug#747270: python-librabbitmq

2014-08-09 Thread Michael Fladischer
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 Brian May wrote on 2014-08-09 11:52: > If I install this package and start a celery process, it works. > > If I downgrade python-librabbitmq to the version in unstable, it > breaks again. So I think the new version may have fixed the > problem. Yes

Bug#747270: [Python-modules-team] Bug#747270: python-librabbitmq

2014-08-09 Thread Michael Fladischer
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 Brian May wrote on 2014-08-09 10:28: > So it makes sense not to use it, but I don't see any justification > for repackaging the orig.tar.gz file. > > Did I miss something? The idea was to save archive space by not shipping duplicated code in the so

Bug#747270: [Python-modules-team] Bug#747270: Bug#747270: python-librabbitmq

2014-08-09 Thread Brian May
Ok, I have built a preliminary package. I changed the build depends to depend on librabbitmq-dev >= 0.4.0, and it uses the pristine upstream source with the changes to setup.py. If I install this package and start a celery process, it works. If I downgrade python-librabbitmq to the version in uns

Bug#747270: [Python-modules-team] Bug#747270: Bug#747270: python-librabbitmq

2014-08-09 Thread Brian May
In debian/control you had: librabbitmq-dev (>= 0.5.0) Are you aware of this being an actual requirement? Debian sid only has 0.4.1 -- Brian May

Bug#747270: [Python-modules-team] Bug#747270: python-librabbitmq

2014-08-09 Thread Brian May
On 29 July 2014 22:29, Michael Fladischer wrote: > > I also note that the version number was called 1.5.0+dfsg-1, which > > suggests you had to repackage the orig.tar.gz file - was this the case? > > See debian/copyright. I excluded the whole embedded librabbitmq-c > library. Thus the +dfsg suffi

Bug#747270: [Python-modules-team] Bug#747270: python-librabbitmq

2014-07-29 Thread Michael Fladischer
On 2014-07-28 07:42, Brian May wrote: > Seems like there was already an attempt to package 1.5.0 (1.5.2 is now > current), based on changes in subversion. > > Did this not work out? It did work out to the point where one should be able to build the package, but I did not find the time to test it.

Bug#747270: [Python-modules-team] Bug#747270: python-librabbitmq

2014-07-27 Thread Brian May
Hello, Seems like there was already an attempt to package 1.5.0 (1.5.2 is now current), based on changes in subversion. Did this not work out? I note that the debian/patches/fix_setup.patch has extensive changes to setup.py (this no longer applies cleanly). I also note that the version number w

Bug#747270: python-librabbitmq

2014-07-27 Thread Brian May
Hello, For the record, the following from bug #756176 (request was cancelled) is relevant here: "This is not entirely correct, python-librabbitmq is actively maintained, its last release 1.5.2[0] was 2 months ago." and "If installed, python-librabbitmq is preferred[1] over python-amqp by celery

Bug#747270: [Python-modules-team] Bug#747270: python-librabbitmq unusable

2014-07-20 Thread Brian May
On 21 July 2014 11:37, Brian May wrote: > > I believe this bug makes python-amqp unusable, and as a result, Grave is > justified. > Sorry, doing to many thing at once. I sent the bug report to the correct place, but it affects python-librabbitmq, not python-amqp. python-amqp is GOOD. -- Brian M