tags 747027 wontfix upstream
severity 747027 normal
thanks
This is a limitation of the upstream software, but the software does
function. Therefore, I am reducing the severity.
Due to the popularity of the emma-coverage package [0], I don't think
it's in our users' best interests to request remo
Le 05/05/2014 01:29, tony mancill a écrit :
> So I believe the question is whether emma provides any value to users if
> it only supports source and target 1.6. If it doesn't, then we should
> request its removal. Otherwise, I think the severity of this bug should
> be decreased.
+1 for removin
On 05/04/2014 01:16 PM, Julian Andres Klode wrote:
> Package: libemma-java
> Version: 2.0.5312+dfsg-4
> Severity: grave
>
> Running emma on bytecode generated by openjdk-7's javac fails, but it
> works fine on Java code produced by openjdk 6. JDK 6 will not be part
> of jessie.
Hi Julian,
This a
Package: libemma-java
Version: 2.0.5312+dfsg-4
Severity: grave
Running emma on bytecode generated by openjdk-7's javac fails, but it
works fine on Java code produced by openjdk 6. JDK 6 will not be part
of jessie.
$ cat Test.java
public class Test {
public static void main(String[] args) {}
4 matches
Mail list logo
