On Thu, 2015-04-16 at 00:49 +0200, Stefano Rivera wrote:
> Hi Adam (2015.03.28_21:09:54_+0200)
> > Argh, this somehow fell through the cracks again. :-(
>
> And then I put this off for two weeks, and it's now out of date.
>
> New revision, including the 8.0 change, but not 7.0, as discussed. Base
Hi Raphael (2015.04.16_11:00:58_+0200)
> FWIW, Debian 6 Squeeze is supported for at least 5 years (i.e. 2016-02-06) and
> most likely until Wheezy is no longer supported (i.e. 2016-04-24).
>
> cf http://wiki.debian.org/LTS
We could hack that in, but we should really support LTS separately. This
i
On Thu, 16 Apr 2015, Stefano Rivera wrote:
> +- Correct EOL date of Debian 6.0 "Squeeze" to 2014-05-31.
FWIW, Debian 6 Squeeze is supported for at least 5 years (i.e. 2016-02-06) and
most likely until Wheezy is no longer supported (i.e. 2016-04-24).
cf http://wiki.debian.org/LTS
--
Raphaël
Hi Adam (2015.03.28_21:09:54_+0200)
> Argh, this somehow fell through the cracks again. :-(
And then I put this off for two weeks, and it's now out of date.
New revision, including the 8.0 change, but not 7.0, as discussed. Based
on #782668:
diff -Nru distro-info-data-0.17~deb7u1/debian/changelo
On Thu, 2015-01-08 at 06:19 +0200, Stefano Rivera wrote:
> Hi Adam (2015.01.06_22:11:55_+0200)
> > To summarise discussions from IRC, Julien pointed out that there are a
> > number of other places where we still refer to Wheezy as 7.0, including
> > the Release Notes and debian-installer-netboot-im
Hi Adam (2015.01.06_22:11:55_+0200)
> To summarise discussions from IRC, Julien pointed out that there are a
> number of other places where we still refer to Wheezy as 7.0, including
> the Release Notes and debian-installer-netboot-images. Combined with the
> fact that this would be a change in sta
Control: tags -1 + confirmed
On Tue, 2015-01-06 at 08:35 +0200, Stefano Rivera wrote:
> Hi Adam (2015.01.02_18:49:41_+0200)
> > Apologies for the delay in getting back to you regarding this. I think
> > when I previously looked at the request I assumed that "we" meant the
> > maintainers, rather t
Hi Adam (2015.01.02_18:49:41_+0200)
> Apologies for the delay in getting back to you regarding this. I think
> when I previously looked at the request I assumed that "we" meant the
> maintainers, rather than also the Release Team.
It meant everyone. But the RT have the final say, so mostly you :)
On Sat, 2014-11-01 at 03:02 +0200, Stefano Rivera wrote:
[...]
> > > I'd argue that 8 would be right for Jessie and 7.0 somewhat wrong for
> > > Wheezy, hence I'd tend to agree to the change. Stefano, where is this
> > > used?
> >
> > I don't know of anything that uses the --release flag (or that
Hi 746946 (2014.11.01_03:02:58_+0200)
> We still need to make a decision on this bit. I've left that patch in,
> for now.
Ping?
SR
--
Stefano Rivera
http://tumbleweed.org.za/
H: +27 21 461 1230 C: +27 72 419 8559
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with
Control: retitle -1 wheezy-pu: package distro-info-data/0.23~deb7u1
Oops, I dropped the ball on this, and now we have more updates to do.
> > I'd argue that 8 would be right for Jessie and 7.0 somewhat wrong for
> > Wheezy, hence I'd tend to agree to the change. Stefano, where is this
> > used?
>
11 matches
Mail list logo
