gcc-11 enables this on
amd64 arm64 i386 ppc64 ppc64el s390x x32
Are there other architectures where it's safe to enable this?
On Mon, May 19, 2014 at 08:03:25PM +0200, Kurt Roeckx wrote:
> On Mon, May 19, 2014 at 12:45:27AM +0200, Mark Wielaard wrote:
> > On Mon, 2014-05-19 at 00:03 +0200, Kurt Roeckx wrote:
> > > > Am 30.04.2014 00:04, schrieb Kurt Roeckx:
> > > > > So reading about this, this might break glibc when you
On Mon, May 19, 2014 at 12:45:27AM +0200, Mark Wielaard wrote:
> On Mon, 2014-05-19 at 00:03 +0200, Kurt Roeckx wrote:
> > > Am 30.04.2014 00:04, schrieb Kurt Roeckx:
> > > > So reading about this, this might break glibc when you enable it
> > > > and they might need to build some files without it.
On Mon, 2014-05-19 at 00:03 +0200, Kurt Roeckx wrote:
> > Am 30.04.2014 00:04, schrieb Kurt Roeckx:
> > > So reading about this, this might break glibc when you enable it
> > > and they might need to build some files without it.
> >
> > Is this enabled by any other distributions?
>
> I assume thi
On Sun, May 18, 2014 at 04:37:47PM +0200, Matthias Klose wrote:
> Control: tags -1 + wontfix
>
> Am 30.04.2014 00:04, schrieb Kurt Roeckx:
> > So reading about this, this might break glibc when you enable it
> > and they might need to build some files without it.
>
> Is this enabled by any other
On Sun, 2014-05-18 at 16:37 +0200, Matthias Klose wrote:
> Is this enabled by any other distributions?
On fedora and RHEL -fasynchronous-unwind-tables is enabled on all
architectures for gcc (otherwise rpmbuild will add it as standard flag).
So all packages are always build with it so you will alw
Control: tags -1 + wontfix
Am 30.04.2014 00:04, schrieb Kurt Roeckx:
> So reading about this, this might break glibc when you enable it
> and they might need to build some files without it.
Is this enabled by any other distributions?
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.d
So reading about this, this might break glibc when you enable it
and they might need to build some files without it.
Kurt
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Package: gcc-4.9
Version: 4.9.0-1
Severity: wishlist
Hi,
It seems that not all arches have -fasynchronous-unwind-tables
enabled. I see it enabled on amd64, i386, s390x, but disabled
on armel/armhf, powerpc.
Could this enable this on more architectures?
I'm currently seeing elfutils test failur
9 matches
Mail list logo
