Hi!
Sorry for the delay on the PK transition, that thing became a bit
complex, since some dependencies of it were not yet ready upstream,
and I was writing a thesis, which took priority.
Anyway, I just wanted to give a quick heads up, since I am going to
upload PK 0.9.x to unstable - depending on t
2014-07-27 13:36 GMT+02:00 Emilio Pozuelo Monfort :
> On 26/07/14 17:38, Matthias Klumpp wrote:
>> 2014-07-09 21:35 GMT+02:00 Matthias Klumpp :
>>> 2014-07-09 20:13 GMT+02:00 Niels Thykier :
Hi,
Any news on this? AFAICT, we are still waiting for an upload of
PackageKit to exper
On 26/07/14 17:38, Matthias Klumpp wrote:
> 2014-07-09 21:35 GMT+02:00 Matthias Klumpp :
>> 2014-07-09 20:13 GMT+02:00 Niels Thykier :
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> Any news on this? AFAICT, we are still waiting for an upload of
>>> PackageKit to experimental.
>>>
>>> Once in experimental, our tooling should au
2014-07-09 21:35 GMT+02:00 Matthias Klumpp :
> 2014-07-09 20:13 GMT+02:00 Niels Thykier :
>> Hi,
>>
>> Any news on this? AFAICT, we are still waiting for an upload of
>> PackageKit to experimental.
>>
>> Once in experimental, our tooling should auto-generate the desired
>> tracker your transition.
2014-07-09 20:13 GMT+02:00 Niels Thykier :
> Hi,
>
> Any news on this? AFAICT, we are still waiting for an upload of
> PackageKit to experimental.
>
> Once in experimental, our tooling should auto-generate the desired
> tracker your transition.
Yes, sorry for the lack of feedback... There were som
On 2014-05-24 16:05, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
> On 29/04/14 17:31, Matthias Klumpp wrote:
>> Package: release.debian.org
>> Severity: normal
>> User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
>> Usertags: transition
>>
>> I want to upload a new version of PackageKit very soon, which has some
>>
On 29/04/14 17:31, Matthias Klumpp wrote:
> Package: release.debian.org
> Severity: normal
> User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
> Usertags: transition
>
> I want to upload a new version of PackageKit very soon, which has some API/ABI
> breaks.
Please upload this to experimental whenever
Sorry, the Benfile mentioned above is wrong... Here's the correct one:
title = "packagekit 0.9";
is_affected = .build-depends ~ /libpackagekit/;
is_good = .depends ~ "libpackagekit-glib2-18" | .depends ~ "libpackagekitqt4-0";
is_bad = .depends ~ "libpackagekit-glib2-16" | .depends ~ "libpackagekit
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: transition
I want to upload a new version of PackageKit very soon, which has some API/ABI
breaks.
Most of the affected packages are maintained by me and need bigger adjustments,
the others should be
9 matches
Mail list logo
