On Tue, Oct 13, 2015 at 10:01:19PM +0200, Tobias Frost wrote:
>
> Looks good so far;
> I still need to complete copyright review, I'll let you know when I
> need something.
Thanks!
>
> PS: You removed the signing key on purpose? Why?
When upstream moved to Github, they stopped signing source p
Am Samstag, den 10.10.2015, 20:44 -0400 schrieb Bill Blough:
> On Fri, Sep 25, 2015 at 10:38:14PM +0200, Tobias Frost wrote:
> > > Issues with the translation files - When the .mo files get
> > > generated,
> > > the .po files get updated with a new timestamp, causing repeat
> > > builds from
> > >
On Fri, Sep 25, 2015 at 10:38:14PM +0200, Tobias Frost wrote:
> > Issues with the translation files - When the .mo files get generated,
> > the .po files get updated with a new timestamp, causing repeat builds from
> > the same source to fail the dpkg-source check.
>
> That's ugly and I guess sho
Hi Bill,
Am Mittwoch, den 23.09.2015, 22:36 -0400 schrieb Bill Blough:
> Thanks so much for all the feedback.
> On Wed, Sep 23, 2015 at 11:03:01PM +0200, Tobias Frost wrote:
> >
> > - d/source/options: Why do you have the option diff-ignore?
>
> Issues with the translation files - When the .mo
Thanks so much for all the feedback.
On Wed, Sep 23, 2015 at 11:03:01PM +0200, Tobias Frost wrote:
>
> - d/source/options: Why do you have the option diff-ignore?
Issues with the translation files - When the .mo files get generated, the .po
files get updated with a new timestamp, causing repeat
Am Mittwoch, den 23.09.2015, 10:33 -0400 schrieb Bill Blough:
> Thanks for your review.
>
> I normally use uscan, so I haven't really thought about get-orig
> -source. But
> it seems like a good idea- I'll look into adding it.
>
> As for sf.net vs github, the project is in the process of changi
Thanks for your review.
I normally use uscan, so I haven't really thought about get-orig-source. But
it seems like a good idea- I'll look into adding it.
As for sf.net vs github, the project is in the process of changing hosting.
The old repo has commits disabled and all new development is bein
Package: sponsorship-requests
Followup-For: Bug #745126
Control: owner -1 !
Hi Bill,
I'll take a look tonight.
Tobi
-- System Information:
Debian Release: stretch/sid
APT prefers stable-updates
APT policy: (500, 'stable-updates'), (500, 'testing'), (500, 'stable')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_6
Package: sponsorship-requests
Followup-For: Bug #745126
PS:
The announcement about the move of the repositoriy to github is here:
https://sourceforge.net/p/passwordsafe/news/2015/08/passwordsafes-git-repository-moved-to-github/?limit=25
-- System Information:
Debian Release: stretch/sid
APT pre
Hi,
I took a peek and didn't find get-orig-source in d/rules. d/watch has link to
github, while pwsafe.org links to sourceforge.
Dear mentors,
I am still looking for a sponsor for my package "passwordsafe"
* Package name: passwordsafe
Version : 0.95.1+dfsg-1
Upstream Author : Rony Shapiro
* URL : http://www.pwsafe.org/
* License : Artistic 2.0
Section : utils
It bui
Dear mentors,
I am still looking for a sponsor for my package "passwordsafe"
* Package name: passwordsafe
Version : 0.95.1+dfsg-1
Upstream Author : Rony Shapiro
* URL : http://www.pwsafe.org/
* License : Artistic 2.0
Section : utils
It bu
12 matches
Mail list logo
