Bug#744171: transition: boost-defaults

2014-07-09 Thread Steve M. Robbins
On July 9, 2014 08:55:04 AM Julien Cristau wrote: > On Wed, Jul 9, 2014 at 01:39:38 -0500, Steve M. Robbins wrote: > > On July 9, 2014 08:15:27 AM Julien Cristau wrote: > > > On Wed, Jul 9, 2014 at 01:03:49 -0500, Steve M. Robbins wrote: > > > > That leaves two Boost versions 1.54 and 1.55, which

Bug#744171: transition: boost-defaults

2014-07-08 Thread Julien Cristau
On Wed, Jul 9, 2014 at 01:39:38 -0500, Steve M. Robbins wrote: > On July 9, 2014 08:15:27 AM Julien Cristau wrote: > > On Wed, Jul 9, 2014 at 01:03:49 -0500, Steve M. Robbins wrote: > > > That leaves two Boost versions 1.54 and 1.55, which made me realize that > > > the transition tracker is too

Bug#744171: transition: boost-defaults

2014-07-08 Thread Steve M. Robbins
On July 9, 2014 08:15:27 AM Julien Cristau wrote: > On Wed, Jul 9, 2014 at 01:03:49 -0500, Steve M. Robbins wrote: > > That leaves two Boost versions 1.54 and 1.55, which made me realize that > > the transition tracker is too pessimistic. Right now 1.54 is considered > > "bad", but it shouldn't b

Bug#744171: transition: boost-defaults

2014-07-08 Thread Julien Cristau
On Wed, Jul 9, 2014 at 01:03:49 -0500, Steve M. Robbins wrote: > That leaves two Boost versions 1.54 and 1.55, which made me realize that the > transition tracker is too pessimistic. Right now 1.54 is considered "bad", > but it shouldn't be. > Why not? I thought the whole point was moving

Bug#744171: transition: boost-defaults

2014-07-08 Thread Steve M. Robbins
On July 5, 2014 06:08:41 PM Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote: > On 02/06/14 11:15, Julien Cristau wrote: > > On Sun, May 25, 2014 at 08:34:08 -0500, Steve M. Robbins wrote: > >> On May 20, 2014 06:48:33 PM Julien Cristau wrote: > >>> Are there bugs tracking packages with versioned boost > >>> build-dep

Bug#744171: transition: boost-defaults

2014-07-05 Thread Emilio Pozuelo Monfort
On 02/06/14 11:15, Julien Cristau wrote: > On Sun, May 25, 2014 at 08:34:08 -0500, Steve M. Robbins wrote: > >> On May 20, 2014 06:48:33 PM Julien Cristau wrote: >> >>> Are there bugs tracking packages with versioned boost >>> build-dependencies? >> >> I'm not aware of any such bugs. >> > Can you

Bug#744171: transition: boost-defaults

2014-06-02 Thread Julien Cristau
On Sun, May 25, 2014 at 08:34:08 -0500, Steve M. Robbins wrote: > On May 20, 2014 06:48:33 PM Julien Cristau wrote: > > > Are there bugs tracking packages with versioned boost > > build-dependencies? > > I'm not aware of any such bugs. > Can you make that happen then? Thanks, Julien signatur

Bug#744171: transition: boost-defaults

2014-05-25 Thread Steve M. Robbins
On May 20, 2014 06:48:33 PM Julien Cristau wrote: > Are there bugs tracking packages with versioned boost > build-dependencies? I'm not aware of any such bugs. -Steve signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part.

Bug#744171: transition: boost-defaults

2014-05-25 Thread Andreas Metzler
On 2014-05-20 Julien Cristau wrote: > On Thu, Apr 10, 2014 at 21:11:18 -0500, Steve M. Robbins wrote: [l...] > > I'd like to switch the boost-defaults to 1.55. > Are there bugs tracking packages with versioned boost > build-dependencies? As far as I can tell that's gpsshogi, hugin, > libos

Bug#744171: transition: boost-defaults

2014-05-20 Thread Julien Cristau
On Thu, Apr 10, 2014 at 21:11:18 -0500, Steve M. Robbins wrote: > Package: release.debian.org > Severity: normal > User: release.debian@packages.debian.org > Usertags: transition > > As previously requested on Feb 28 2014 (see > https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=704032#220): >

Bug#744171: transition: boost-defaults

2014-05-13 Thread Julien Cristau
On Thu, Apr 10, 2014 at 21:11:18 -0500, Steve M. Robbins wrote: > As previously requested on Feb 28 2014 (see > https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=704032#220): > > 1.55 has been in testing for a month now and has somewhat better > support for recent glibc -- e.g. it doesn't

Bug#744171: [pkg-boost-devel] Bug#744171: transition: boost-defaults

2014-05-03 Thread Dimitri John Ledkov
On 11 April 2014 03:11, Steve M. Robbins wrote: > Package: release.debian.org > Severity: normal > User: release.debian@packages.debian.org > Usertags: transition > > As previously requested on Feb 28 2014 (see > https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=704032#220): > > 1.55 has b

Bug#744171: transition: boost-defaults

2014-04-12 Thread Cyril Brulebois
Steve M. Robbins (2014-04-11): > Thanks for the fast action on this! You're welcome… > On April 11, 2014 10:41:45 AM Cyril Brulebois wrote: > > Since there was an old boost1.54 ben file around, I've reused it, > > tweaking the versions: > > > > title = "boost 1.55"; > > is_affected = .build

Bug#744171: transition: boost-defaults

2014-04-11 Thread Steve M. Robbins
Hello Cyril, Thanks for the fast action on this! On April 11, 2014 10:41:45 AM Cyril Brulebois wrote: > Since there was an old boost1.54 ben file around, I've reused it, > tweaking the versions: > > title = "boost 1.55"; > is_affected = .build-depends ~ /libboost[0-9\.a-z-]*-dev/; > is_g

Bug#744171: transition: boost-defaults

2014-04-11 Thread Cyril Brulebois
Control: forwarded -1 https://release.debian.org/transitions/html/boost1.55.html Steve M. Robbins (2014-04-10): > Package: release.debian.org > Severity: normal > User: release.debian@packages.debian.org > Usertags: transition > > As previously requested on Feb 28 2014 (see > https://bugs.de

Bug#744171: transition: boost-defaults

2014-04-10 Thread Steve M. Robbins
Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: transition As previously requested on Feb 28 2014 (see https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=704032#220): 1.55 has been in testing for a month now and has somewhat better suppor