Am Sonntag, den 24.01.2016, 12:39 +0300 schrieb Sergei Golovan:
> Hi Tobias,
>
> On Sun, Jan 24, 2016 at 12:17 PM, Tobias Frost wrote:
> > (Resent -- buxtehude.d.o was down yesterday)
> >
> > > Gianfranco,
> > > can you elaborate?
> > > (Its not common that libpng16 patches breaks compatiblity w
Hi Tobias,
On Sun, Jan 24, 2016 at 12:17 PM, Tobias Frost wrote:
> (Resent -- buxtehude.d.o was down yesterday)
>
>> Gianfranco,
>> can you elaborate?
>> (Its not common that libpng16 patches breaks compatiblity with
>> libpng12)
It's just the way it's written. You can look here
http://sourcefor
(Resent -- buxtehude.d.o was down yesterday)
Am Samstag, den 23.01.2016, 18:40 +0100 schrieb Tobias Frost:
> On Fri, 22 Jan 2016 22:26:07 +0300 Sergei Golovan
> wrote:
> > On Fri, Jan 22, 2016 at 10:18 PM, Gianfranco Costamagna
> > wrote:
> > > Hi, so are you saying this version is incompatible
On Fri, Jan 22, 2016 at 10:18 PM, Gianfranco Costamagna
wrote:
> Hi, so are you saying this version is incompatible with libpng12?
Yes, that libtk-img will be incompatible with libpng12.
--
Sergei Golovan
Hi, so are you saying this version is incompatible with libpng12?
Cheers
G.
Sent from Yahoo Mail on Android
On Fri, 22 Jan, 2016 at 19:15, Sergei Golovan wrote: tags
741894 + pending
thanks
Hi again!
On Fri, Jan 22, 2016 at 3:37 PM, Gianfranco Costamagna
wrote:
>
> wonderful!
> please n
tags 741894 + pending
thanks
Hi again!
On Fri, Jan 22, 2016 at 3:37 PM, Gianfranco Costamagna
wrote:
>
> wonderful!
> please note that the transition might start soon(TM), maybe in a week or two,
> so this bug might become RC soon.
I've prepared the fixed package, but I won't upload it to exper
Hi Sergei!
>> can you please apply them?
>
>I don't want to apply patches to the current 1.4.2 version anymore.
>There are way too many
>of them already. Instead, I'm planning to upload a new version (1.4.4,
>which was never
>released as a tarball but have support for libpng 1.6 without external
Hi Gianfranco,
On Fri, Jan 22, 2016 at 3:12 PM, Gianfranco Costamagna
wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA256
>
> Hi
>
As a result, we checked that your package was FTBFS.
Yes, I know that.
>
> I see fedora has patches for the FTBFS
> https://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/cgit/
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Hi
>>> As a result, we checked that your package was FTBFS.
I see fedora has patches for the FTBFS
https://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/cgit/rpms/tkimg.git/tree/
can you please apply them?
cheers,
Gianfranco
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuP
Hi!
Yes, I know.
If you are using amd64, you can use apt-line on chroot following:
deb http://people.debian.org/~iwamatsu/libpng16/repos/ ./
This repository is signed with my GPG key.
Thanks for your help!
Best regards,
Nobuhiro
2014-03-18 16:27 GMT+09:00 Sergei Golovan :
> Hi Nobuhiro,
>
Hi Nobuhiro,
On Mon, Mar 17, 2014 at 4:59 AM, Nobuhiro Iwamatsu wrote:
> libpng is already installed in experimental, and we are re-building
> the package depending on libpng16.
> As a result, we checked that your package was FTBFS.
> Would you check also in your environment?
> And if a problem c
Source: libtk-img
Version: 1:1.4.2-4
User: lib...@packages.debian.org
Usertags: libpng15-transition
Hi,
libpng maintainers have a plan transition of libpng[0].
libpng is already installed in experimental, and we are re-building
the package depending on libpng16.
As a result, we checked that you
12 matches
Mail list logo
