Sam Hartman writes ("Bug#741573: Comparison of Options AB and D"):
> I agree that we should not pick an entirely new design.
> Here though, option D does not pick an entirely new design.
Option D does something much much worse. It
- mandates that an new design[1]
Le dimanche, 30 août 2015, 13.01:36 Nikolaus Rath a écrit :
> On Aug 30 2015, Sam Hartman wrote:
> > Nikolaus> Surely there is no need to single out the traditional
> > Nikolaus> menu as something that must not be used. It's
> > Nikolaus> sufficient if policy mandates the use of .desk
> "Nikolaus" == Nikolaus Rath writes:
Nikolaus> A. This comes very close to design work which the CTTE
Nikolaus> should not be doing. If there's a conflict between two
Nikolaus> crappy designs and the CTTE is asked to rule, then you
Nikolaus> should pick the less crappy one or
On Aug 30 2015, Sam Hartman wrote:
>> "Nikolaus" == Nikolaus Rath writes:
>
> Nikolaus> On Aug 29 2015, Sam Hartman wrote:
> >> Option D goes further. Option D requires that packages drop
> >> their traditional menu entries if they ship .desktop files.
> >> (That's done on a
> "Nikolaus" == Nikolaus Rath writes:
Nikolaus> On Aug 29 2015, Sam Hartman wrote:
>> Option D goes further. Option D requires that packages drop
>> their traditional menu entries if they ship .desktop files.
>> (That's done on a per-application not per-package basis).
On Aug 29 2015, Sam Hartman wrote:
> Option D goes further. Option D requires that packages drop their
> traditional menu entries if they ship .desktop files. (That's done on a
> per-application not per-package basis).
That would be a pretty ridiculous situation. So package maintainers
would be
Hi.
So, after working with Keith yesterday on his option, I think I have a
much better understanding of what the tradeoffs are.
I'd like to present these to the TC as we're about to vote.
I'm ignoring ballot option C (afirm the status quo) in this.
I'm also treating options A and B as the same
7 matches
Mail list logo
