On Sat, May 10, 2014 at 12:38:23AM +0200, Julien Cristau wrote:
> [why was this not sent to the bug?]
used "reply to list" instead of "reply" by mistake
> On Fri, May 9, 2014 at 19:23:55 -0300, Antonio Terceiro wrote:
>
> > On Fri, May 09, 2014 at 06:47:46AM +0200, Christian Hofstaedtler wrote:
[why was this not sent to the bug?]
On Fri, May 9, 2014 at 19:23:55 -0300, Antonio Terceiro wrote:
> On Fri, May 09, 2014 at 06:47:46AM +0200, Christian Hofstaedtler wrote:
> > Dear Release Team,
> >
> > Please remove ruby1.9.1 at your earliest convenience from testing.
>
> Once that is done,
Dear Release Team,
Please remove ruby1.9.1 at your earliest convenience from testing.
`dak rm -s testing ruby1.9.1` gives the following leftovers:
- xapian-bindings: should go in today if I haven't missed anything
- ruby-patron: FTBFS, will certainly take a long time to fix
- ruby-gnome2: fix in
On 2014-04-09 03:14, Christian Hofstaedtler wrote:
> Dear Release-Team,
>
> In addition to my previous list, please binNMU the following
> packages to remove the (lib)ruby1.9.1 dependencies:
>
> vim
> notmuch
> hyperestraier
>
Scheduled all here except vim (per James McCoy's mail)
~Niels
--
On 2014-04-09 02:09, Christian Hofstaedtler wrote:
> Dear Release Team,
>
> We've determined a new set of packages that need to be rebuilt and
> that also can be rebuilt now. Please binNMU the packages below.
>
> (This list has been filtered for a few FTBFS issues, except for mysql
> packages whi
On Wed, Apr 09, 2014 at 03:14:56AM +0200, Christian Hofstaedtler wrote:
> Dear Release-Team,
>
> In addition to my previous list, please binNMU the following
> packages to remove the (lib)ruby1.9.1 dependencies:
Dear RT members, could some of you please schedule these binNMUs? This
is kind of blo
Dear Release-Team,
In addition to my previous list, please binNMU the following
packages to remove the (lib)ruby1.9.1 dependencies:
vim
notmuch
hyperestraier
--
,''`. Christian Hofstaedtler
: :' : Debian Developer
`. `' 7D1A CFFA D9E0 806C 9C4C D392 5C13 D6DB 9305 2E03
`-
signature.
Dear Release Team,
We've determined a new set of packages that need to be rebuilt and
that also can be rebuilt now. Please binNMU the packages below.
(This list has been filtered for a few FTBFS issues, except for mysql
packages which likely FTBFS due to an issue in the test environment.)
rrdto
On Tue, Apr 1, 2014 at 21:34:34 -0300, Antonio Terceiro wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 01, 2014 at 09:25:53PM -0300, Antonio Terceiro wrote:
> > Hello release team,
> >
> > Going on with the transition to remove ruby1.9.1, I would like to
> > request binNMUs for the following packages on unstable:
> >
>
On Tue, Apr 01, 2014 at 09:25:53PM -0300, Antonio Terceiro wrote:
> Hello release team,
>
> Going on with the transition to remove ruby1.9.1, I would like to
> request binNMUs for the following packages on unstable:
>
[...]
I realized that some of these will need new versions of other packages i
Hello release team,
Going on with the transition to remove ruby1.9.1, I would like to
request binNMUs for the following packages on unstable:
raspell
ruby-atomic
ruby-augeas
ruby-bcrypt
ruby-blockenspiel
ruby-bluecloth
ruby-bson-ext
ruby-cairo
ruby-charlock-holmes
ruby-curb
ruby-dataobjects-mysql
11 matches
Mail list logo
