Bug#738170: Patch

2014-02-19 Thread Tomasz Nitecki
On 19/02/14 22:14, Matt Kraai wrote: > Hi, > > On Wed, Feb 19, 2014 at 08:54:30PM +0100, Lucas Nussbaum wrote: >> How about making it -s/--seen and -a/--all (for all packages)? > > I tried -s/--seen, but since the documentation already referred to new > opportunities, I ended up going with -o/--o

Bug#738170: Patch

2014-02-19 Thread Matt Kraai
Hi, On Wed, Feb 19, 2014 at 08:54:30PM +0100, Lucas Nussbaum wrote: > How about making it -s/--seen and -a/--all (for all packages)? > > I agree that breaking the options is not very nice, but it doesn't sound > like a critical breakage. I tried -s/--seen, but since the documentation already ref

Bug#738170: Patch

2014-02-19 Thread Lucas Nussbaum
On 18/02/14 at 23:07 -0800, Matt Kraai wrote: > On Wed, Feb 19, 2014 at 07:04:33AM +0100, Tomasz Nitecki wrote: > > Provided patch works flawlessly. I also agree that we should consider > > renaming -a and -u options. However, nothing reasonable and *short* > > comes to me at the moment. > > How a

Bug#738170: Patch

2014-02-18 Thread Matt Kraai
On Wed, Feb 19, 2014 at 07:04:33AM +0100, Tomasz Nitecki wrote: > Provided patch works flawlessly. I also agree that we should consider > renaming -a and -u options. However, nothing reasonable and *short* > comes to me at the moment. How about renaming -a/--all to -s/--seen and adding -u/--uninst

Bug#738170: Patch

2014-02-18 Thread Tomasz Nitecki
Hey, Provided patch works flawlessly. I also agree that we should consider renaming -a and -u options. However, nothing reasonable and *short* comes to me at the moment. Just one thing - if we decide to add the 'ignore selected types of opportunities' option from #738169, we should make it apply