Bug#737906: transition: eglibc

2014-03-02 Thread Julien Cristau
On Sun, Feb 23, 2014 at 21:03:41 +, Adam D. Barratt wrote: > On Mon, 2014-02-17 at 18:20 +, Adam D. Barratt wrote: > > On 2014-02-06 21:20, Adam Conrad wrote: > > > Requestion a transition slot to upload eglibc 2.18 to unstable. > > > The number of rdeps with an exact glibc dependency (due

Bug#739913: Bug#737906: transition: eglibc

2014-02-23 Thread Adam Conrad
reassign 739913 eglibc kthxbye On Sun, Feb 23, 2014 at 09:03:41PM +, Adam D. Barratt wrote: > > One problem is libnih's FTBFS on i386 - #739913. This looks like another incarnation of a binutils bug being tickled by a glibc bug, that was discussed on launchpad[1] and upstream[2]. I'm testin

Bug#737906: transition: eglibc

2014-02-23 Thread Adam D. Barratt
On Mon, 2014-02-17 at 18:20 +, Adam D. Barratt wrote: > On 2014-02-06 21:20, Adam Conrad wrote: > > Requestion a transition slot to upload eglibc 2.18 to unstable. > > The number of rdeps with an exact glibc dependency (due to using > > internal symbols) is quite low, and should all be binNMUab

Bug#737906: transition: eglibc

2014-02-17 Thread Adam D. Barratt
Control: tags -1 + confirmed On 2014-02-06 21:20, Adam Conrad wrote: Requestion a transition slot to upload eglibc 2.18 to unstable. The number of rdeps with an exact glibc dependency (due to using internal symbols) is quite low, and should all be binNMUable. Assuming that all we're expecting

Bug#737906: transition: eglibc

2014-02-06 Thread Adam Conrad
Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: transition (please explain about the transition: impacted packages, reason, ... for more info see: https://wiki.debian.org/Teams/ReleaseTeam/Transitions) Requestion a transition slot to upload egl