Bug#737658: some notes on util-linux takeover of eject

2020-05-08 Thread Holger Wansing
Hi all, Cyril Brulebois wrote: > Hi, > > Chris Hofstaedtler (2020-05-03): > > * Cyril Brulebois : > > > Michael Biebl (2017-10-24): > > > > > > But there is one complication: I noticed that eject in util-linux > > > > currently linux only. > > > > > > > > If we made the udeb linux-any, how

Bug#737658: some notes on util-linux takeover of eject

2020-05-05 Thread atzlinux 肖盛文
在 2020/5/6 上午3:49, Chris Hofstaedtler 写道: [...] > util-linux would grow a new eject binary package (to avoid growing > the essential util-linux binary package). > I think util-linux (actually the new eject binary package) can get a > NEWS.Debian entry that lists alternative options for volname. Us

Bug#737658: some notes on util-linux takeover of eject

2020-05-05 Thread Chris Hofstaedtler
* atzlinux 肖盛文 [200505 05:30]: > > 在 2020/5/4 下午7:40, Andreas Henriksson 写道: [...] > > > >> 2) volname apparently uses knowledge about ISO9660 directly, and > >> personally I'd rather see users use blkid instead, like so: > >> /usr/sbin/blkid -s LABEL ./debian-10.3.0-amd64-netinst.iso > >> ./

Bug#737658: some notes on util-linux takeover of eject

2020-05-04 Thread atzlinux 肖盛文
在 2020/5/4 下午7:40, Andreas Henriksson 写道: > Control: affects -1 eject > > Hi, > > On Mon, May 04, 2020 at 12:08:10PM +0200, Chris Hofstaedtler wrote: >> Hi everyone, >> >> (Adding CC: mpitt@, as the dmcrypt-get-device author.) >> >> * atzlinux 肖盛文 [200504 05:16]: >>> Hi Chris, >>> >>> 在 2020/5/4

Bug#737658: some notes on util-linux takeover of eject

2020-05-04 Thread Andreas Henriksson
Control: affects -1 eject Hi, On Mon, May 04, 2020 at 12:08:10PM +0200, Chris Hofstaedtler wrote: > Hi everyone, > > (Adding CC: mpitt@, as the dmcrypt-get-device author.) > > * atzlinux 肖盛文 [200504 05:16]: > > Hi Chris, > > > > 在 2020/5/4 上午6:09, Chris Hofstaedtler 写道: > > > Hi xiao sheng we

Bug#737658: some notes on util-linux takeover of eject

2020-05-04 Thread Chris Hofstaedtler
Hi everyone, (Adding CC: mpitt@, as the dmcrypt-get-device author.) * atzlinux 肖盛文 [200504 05:16]: > Hi Chris, > > 在 2020/5/4 上午6:09, Chris Hofstaedtler 写道: > > Hi xiao sheng wen, > > > > I've noticed you've recently taken over maintenance of the eject > > package, after it was unmaintained for

Bug#737658: some notes on util-linux takeover of eject

2020-05-03 Thread atzlinux 肖盛文
Hi Chris, 在 2020/5/4 上午6:09, Chris Hofstaedtler 写道: > Hi xiao sheng wen, > > I've noticed you've recently taken over maintenance of the eject > package, after it was unmaintained for years. > > Probably unbeknownst to you, plans were made to replace the eject > (and eject-udeb) packages with code

Bug#737658: some notes on util-linux takeover of eject

2020-05-03 Thread Chris Hofstaedtler
Hi xiao sheng wen, I've noticed you've recently taken over maintenance of the eject package, after it was unmaintained for years. Probably unbeknownst to you, plans were made to replace the eject (and eject-udeb) packages with code from util-linux. I understand that it must be somewhat soul-crus

Bug#737658: some notes on util-linux takeover of eject

2020-05-03 Thread Cyril Brulebois
Hi, Chris Hofstaedtler (2020-05-03): > * Cyril Brulebois : > > Michael Biebl (2017-10-24): > > > > But there is one complication: I noticed that eject in util-linux > > > currently linux only. > > > > > > If we made the udeb linux-any, how would this affect the installer? > > > > It might me

Bug#737658: some notes on util-linux takeover of eject

2020-05-03 Thread Chris Hofstaedtler
Hi, * Cyril Brulebois : > Michael Biebl (2017-10-24): > > But there is one complication: I noticed that eject in util-linux > > currently linux only. > > > > If we made the udeb linux-any, how would this affect the installer? > > It might mean a regression on kfreebsd-* (I don't see an eject-

Bug#737658: some notes on util-linux takeover of eject

2017-10-26 Thread Cyril Brulebois
Michael Biebl (2017-10-26): > The debconf templates are of course translated. What I meant is that I > don't ship /usr/share/locale in the eject udeb. I think I misread gettext as debconf when I received your mail, and I really should have read it more thoroughly before replying. > Or is it impo

Bug#737658: some notes on util-linux takeover of eject

2017-10-26 Thread Michael Biebl
Am 26.10.2017 um 16:59 schrieb Cyril Brulebois: > Hi, > > Michael Biebl (2017-10-24): >> It's actually smaller then the old eject-udeb as I didn't include the >> gettext translations. > > Why? OK this was late and maybe I wasn't clear on IRC, but keeping the > i18n + l10n part working is importa

Bug#737658: some notes on util-linux takeover of eject

2017-10-26 Thread Cyril Brulebois
Hi, Michael Biebl (2017-10-24): > It's actually smaller then the old eject-udeb as I didn't include the > gettext translations. Why? OK this was late and maybe I wasn't clear on IRC, but keeping the i18n + l10n part working is important. > But there is one complication: I noticed that eject in

Bug#737658: some notes on util-linux takeover of eject

2017-10-23 Thread Michael Biebl
Hi KiBi, thanks for your reply. I've pushed a wip branch to https://anonscm.debian.org/cgit/collab-maint/pkg-util-linux.git/log/?h=wip/eject The resulting binary packages look fine afaics, especially the udeb: $ dpkg --info eject-udeb_2.30.2-0.1_amd64.udeb new Debian package, version 2.0. siz

Bug#737658: some notes on util-linux takeover of eject

2017-10-22 Thread Cyril Brulebois
Hi, Michael Biebl (2017-10-16): > I've CCed debian-boot for this specific issue Thanks. > On Mon, 1 Jun 2015 18:28:03 +0200 Andreas Henriksson > wrote: > > > * udeb > > > > The eject package builds the eject-udeb package, which util-linux > > will need to provide. (Another option would b

Bug#737658: some notes on util-linux takeover of eject

2017-10-16 Thread Michael Biebl
I've CCed debian-boot for this specific issue On Mon, 1 Jun 2015 18:28:03 +0200 Andreas Henriksson wrote: > * udeb > > The eject package builds the eject-udeb package, which util-linux > will need to provide. (Another option would be to ship it inside > util-linux-udeb but that would prob

Bug#737658: some notes on util-linux takeover of eject

2015-06-01 Thread Andreas Henriksson
On Mon, Jun 01, 2015 at 01:58:52PM -0400, Phil Susi wrote: > On 6/1/2015 1:49 PM, Andreas Henriksson wrote: > >First of all the mount program is not shipped in (binary package) > >util-linux, but in the package called mount (on linux-any). > >(This is mostly a historic heritage I guess.) > > Ok, b

Bug#737658: some notes on util-linux takeover of eject

2015-06-01 Thread Phil Susi
On 6/1/2015 1:49 PM, Andreas Henriksson wrote: First of all the mount program is not shipped in (binary package) util-linux, but in the package called mount (on linux-any). (This is mostly a historic heritage I guess.) Ok, but it's still packaged in some udeb that is part of d-i right? And wh

Bug#737658: some notes on util-linux takeover of eject

2015-06-01 Thread Andreas Henriksson
On Mon, Jun 01, 2015 at 01:36:22PM -0400, Phil Susi wrote: > On 6/1/2015 12:28 PM, Andreas Henriksson wrote: > > The eject utility from util-linux will also bring a dependency > > on libmount, which currently has no udeb. This needs to be added > > as well. Should hopefully not be an issue...

Bug#737658: some notes on util-linux takeover of eject

2015-06-01 Thread Phil Susi
On 6/1/2015 12:28 PM, Andreas Henriksson wrote: The eject utility from util-linux will also bring a dependency on libmount, which currently has no udeb. This needs to be added as well. Should hopefully not be an issue... (famous last words?) Wait, how can this be? Certainly the mount

Bug#737658: some notes on util-linux takeover of eject

2015-06-01 Thread Andreas Henriksson
Hello! Here are a few notes I've made when looking at making util-linux take over the eject utility, which as I understand it there are consensus on doing. * Shipped tools Apart from /usr/bin/eject, the eject package also ships: /usr/lib/eject/dmcrypt-get-device /usr/bin/volname dmcrypt-