Bug#735488: qt4-x11: Add arm64 support

On Wednesday 20 August 2014 22:57:31 Wookey wrote: > +++ Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez Meyer [2014-08-16 12:02 -0300]: [snip] > The kernel calls it 'arm64' and so does Apple in their webkit patches, > so we are not the only ones, but aarch64 is often used internally, as > despite being a silly name

Bug#735488: qt4-x11: Add arm64 support

+++ Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez Meyer [2014-08-16 12:04 -0300]: > WRT the mkspecs changes I am currently asking upstream if adding an mkspec > just for getting rid of -m64 is the right way to go. Maybe we can add an > exception somewhere without the need of adding another mkspec. Yes. I think

Bug#735488: qt4-x11: Add arm64 support

On Saturday 16 August 2014 11:35:10 Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez Meyer wrote: > I have a doubt: why do you disable javascript-jit for arm64? Should this be > happening in other archs? Because I have not received any bug reports wrt > this yet. I have already asked you this before and you replied,

Bug#735488: qt4-x11: Add arm64 support

On Friday 15 August 2014 22:05:44 Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez Meyer wrote: [snip] > > OK. So I've brought the atomic queries to the attention of Steve > > Capper, who understands this stuff. He observed that the memory > > barriers are not the right type. They'll work (as they are the 'mos > > e

Bug#735488: qt4-x11: Add arm64 support

WRT the mkspecs changes I am currently asking upstream if adding an mkspec just for getting rid of -m64 is the right way to go. Maybe we can add an exception somewhere without the need of adding another mkspec. -- 20:57 * m4rgin4l patento el proceso de invencion 20:57 < m4rgin4l> de aqui en ma

Bug#735488: qt4-x11: Add arm64 support

WRT the mkspecs changes I am currently asking upstream if adding an mkspec just for getting rid of -m64 is the right way to go. Maybe we can add an exception somewhere without the need of adding another mkspec. -- 20:57 * m4rgin4l patento el proceso de invencion 20:57 < m4rgin4l> de aqui en ma

Bug#735488: qt4-x11: Add arm64 support

On Friday 15 August 2014 23:46:19 Wookey wrote: [snip] > In an attempt to solve the -fpermissive thing, I updated the patches > for the current qt4-x11 package to try and get an example build log > (without -fpermissive) to wave at people who grokked C++ and > arm64. This involved some tweaking of

Bug#735488: qt4-x11: Add arm64 support

I have a doubt: why do you disable javascript-jit for arm64? Should this be happening in other archs? Because I have not received any bug reports wrt this yet. -- La mejor prueba de que la navegación en el tiempo no es posible, es el hecho de no haber sido invadidos por masas de turistas proven

Bug#735488: qt4-x11: Add arm64 support

+++ Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez Meyer [2014-08-15 22:05 -0300]: > I was really expecting this mail :) > > First of all, allow me to congratulate you an the rest of the arm64 porters > for it's inclusion in the archive :) Cheers. We're making good progress there. > This is a "quick and dirty"

Bug#735488: qt4-x11: Add arm64 support

I was really expecting this mail :) First of all, allow me to congratulate you an the rest of the arm64 porters for it's inclusion in the archive :) This is a "quick and dirty" mail to let you know that I'm looking at this, but please give me some time to check this facts. Tip: I'm not currentl

Bug#735488: qt4-x11: Add arm64 support

Package: src:qt4-x11 Followup-For: Bug #735488 OK. So I've brought the atomic queries to the attention of Steve Capper, who understands this stuff. He observed that the memory barriers are not the right type. They'll work (as they are the 'mos expensive' type) but will be slower than is necessary

Bug#735488: qt4-x11: Add arm64 support

On Thursday 16 January 2014 00:16:03 Wookey wrote: [snip] > The whole log is 2.5MB. Want it all? A useful excerpt is attached. I've taken a look at the excerpt and checked with the team. We will need a proper fix without ussing -fpermissive. In the example from the build log, we might get strang

Bug#735488: qt4-x11: Add arm64 support

Dmitry Shachnev points me at [0], it makes things easier :) [0] -- I still maintain the point that designing a monolithic kernel in 1991 is a fundamental error. Be thankful you are not my student. You would not get

Bug#735488: qt4-x11: Add arm64 support

On Wednesday 15 January 2014 16:42:42 Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez Meyer wrote: > On Wednesday 15 January 2014 15:57:47 Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez Meyer > > wrote: > > On Wednesday 15 January 2014 15:30:51 Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez Meyer > > [snip] > > > > > 1) It uses autotools-dev and

Bug#735488: qt4-x11: Add arm64 support

On Wednesday 15 January 2014 15:57:47 Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez Meyer wrote: > On Wednesday 15 January 2014 15:30:51 Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez Meyer [snip] > > > 1) It uses autotools-dev and the dh_ helpers to ensure > > > config.{sub,guess} > > > are up to date rather than patching them d

Bug#735488: qt4-x11: Add arm64 support

On Wednesday 15 January 2014 18:17:19 Wookey wrote: > Source: qt4-x11 > Version: 4.8.5 > Severity: normal > Tags: patch > User: debian-...@lists.debian.org > Usertag: arm64 > > This package fails to build on arm64 without this patch. It is largely > based on the ubuntu patches in 4:4.8.4+dfsg-0ub

Bug#735488: qt4-x11: Add arm64 support

On Wednesday 15 January 2014 15:30:51 Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez Meyer wrote: > On Wednesday 15 January 2014 18:17:19 Wookey wrote: > > Source: qt4-x11 > > Version: 4.8.5 > > Severity: normal > > Tags: patch > > User: debian-...@lists.debian.org > > Usertag: arm64 > > > > This package fails to

Bug#735488: qt4-x11: Add arm64 support

On Wednesday 15 January 2014 18:17:19 Wookey wrote: > Source: qt4-x11 > Version: 4.8.5 > Severity: normal > Tags: patch > User: debian-...@lists.debian.org > Usertag: arm64 > > This package fails to build on arm64 without this patch. It is largely > based on the ubuntu patches in 4:4.8.4+dfsg-0ub

Bug#735488: qt4-x11: Add arm64 support

Source: qt4-x11 Version: 4.8.5 Severity: normal Tags: patch User: debian-...@lists.debian.org Usertag: arm64 This package fails to build on arm64 without this patch. It is largely based on the ubuntu patches in 4:4.8.4+dfsg-0ubuntu15, 4:4.8.4+dfsg-0ubuntu17, and the important fix in 4:4.8.4+dfsg-