On 20/01/14 00:39, Robert Millan wrote:
> tags 726248 pending
> thanks
>
> On 19/01/2014 08:53, Samuel Bronson wrote:
>> [...] it's best if you split them
>> off into their own, non-build-essential package, which systemtap-sdt-dev
>> could safely conflict with, but dtrace could still explicitly us
tags 726248 pending
thanks
On 19/01/2014 08:53, Samuel Bronson wrote:
> Hmm, I must have thought this was covered well enough in:
>
> http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=726248#110
>
> But I guess that left out the detail that Replaces is supposed to be
> accompanied by Breaks (or C
Robert Millan writes:
> What's wrong with Replaces: ? I proposed this in my last mail, but it
> went unanswered:
>
> http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=726248#105
>
> I really don't see why you want us to remove legacy functionality from
> k-k-h. As far as I can see its presence doe
Hi Samuel,
On 06/01/2014 00:59, Samuel Bronson wrote:
> Given the facts:
>
> - nobody has ported the dtrace userspace to [e]glibc yet
>
> - there *are* packages that could benefit from systemtap's version of
> ; in particular, GDB can use such probes, and has
> particular support
Package: kfreebsd-kernel-headers
Version: 9.2~5
Severity: normal
Control: block 726248 by -1
Dear Maintainer,
Given the facts:
- nobody has ported the dtrace userspace to [e]glibc yet
- there *are* packages that could benefit from systemtap's version of
; in particular, GDB can use su
5 matches
Mail list logo
