Hello Thomas and Tony,
CCing Javascript team (JS Team, please see below for why), and fixing
threading, since top-posting is confusing. Reply follows inline:
Thomas Koch writes:
>> tony mancill hat am 29.03.2022 07:26 geschrieben:
>> > On Mon, Mar 28, 2022 at 03:27:17PM -0400, Nicholas D Steev
Hello,
sorry, I was under the wrong impression that closure-compiler would be
abandoned upstream and that it would eventually die of age and be removed.
I packaged closure-compiler as a dependency of the code review system Gerrit
which however couldn't be packaged at the time due to GWT.
Whoeve
Hello Nicholas,
On Mon, Mar 28, 2022 at 03:27:17PM -0400, Nicholas D Steeves wrote:
> Control: unblock 886411 by -1
>
> Hi Tony and Thomas,
>
> This package came to my attention via #975505, where it was noted that
> MathJax2 has had to disable functionality because of too ancient of a
> closure
Control: unblock 886411 by -1
Hi Tony and Thomas,
This package came to my attention via #975505, where it was noted that
MathJax2 has had to disable functionality because of too ancient of a
closure-compiler, and at this time it appears that MathJax3 will have to
do the same.
Closure-compiler is
Control: block 886411 by -1
On Sat, 20 Jan 2018 20:38:02 +0530 Pirate Praveen
wrote:> Being more familiar with nodejs packaging, I prefer to go back to
> google-closure-compiler-js. But if there is a newer closure-compiler,
> it'd make my work a lot easier.
>
Hi Tony,
Digging deeper, I found o
On Thu, 29 Dec 2016 08:36:00 -0800 tony mancill
wrote:> So, in summary, I haven't been much progress on an new version
(despite
> a number of failed starts). I'm happy to work together with someone,
> or to help with sponsoring and/or reviewing.
I'm packaging reactjs and it needs google-closure-
On Wed, Dec 28, 2016 at 10:33:06PM +0100, Sascha Steinbiss wrote:
Hello Sascha and other interested parties:
> Hi Tony,
>
> On Wed, 04 Nov 2015 22:49:23 -0800 tony mancill wrote:
> > On 2015-11-04 14:21, Christoph Biedl wrote:
> > > Source: closure-compiler
> > > Version: 20130227+dfsg1-8
> > >
Hi Tony,
On Wed, 04 Nov 2015 22:49:23 -0800 tony mancill wrote:
> On 2015-11-04 14:21, Christoph Biedl wrote:
> > Source: closure-compiler
> > Version: 20130227+dfsg1-8
> > Followup-For: Bug #733586
> >
> > Gentle ping? The latest upstream release is 20151015 as far as I can
> > see. There have
On 2015-11-04 14:21, Christoph Biedl wrote:
Source: closure-compiler
Version: 20130227+dfsg1-8
Followup-For: Bug #733586
Gentle ping? The latest upstream release is 20151015 as far as I can
see. There have been some changes so the present Debianisation cannot
simply be forwarded. My skills in Ja
Source: closure-compiler
Version: 20130227+dfsg1-8
Followup-For: Bug #733586
Gentle ping? The latest upstream release is 20151015 as far as I can
see. There have been some changes so the present Debianisation cannot
simply be forwarded. My skills in Java packaging are however somewhat
limited.
Source: closure-compiler
Severity: wishlist
Dear Java Team,
Please consider updating closure-compiler to a newer upstream version. The
most recent tagged release is v20131118.
Thank you,
tony (filing a reminder bug)
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a
11 matches
Mail list logo
