Bug#732291: Bug#732291: files in src/* have license GPLv2+

2014-01-09 Thread Jonas Smedegaard
Quoting Andrew Shadura (2014-01-09 16:48:12) > On Thu, 09 Jan 2014 15:24:59 +0100 Jonas Smedegaard > wrote: >>> I don't think it's a bug. If source is distributed as GPL-2+, you're >>> free to take it as either GPL-2, or any later version. As GPL-2 and >>> GPL-3 are incompatible, to link agains

Bug#732291: Bug#732291: files in src/* have license GPLv2+

2014-01-09 Thread Andrew Shadura
Hello, (First of all, I'm not the maintainer of a package.) On Thu, 09 Jan 2014 15:24:59 +0100 Jonas Smedegaard wrote: > > I don't think it's a bug. If source is distributed as GPL-2+, > > you're free to take it as either GPL-2, or any later version. As > > GPL-2 and GPL-3 are incompatible, to l

Bug#732291: [Pkg-osm-maint] Bug#732291: files in src/* have license GPLv2+

2014-01-09 Thread Jonas Smedegaard
Quoting Andrew Shadura (2014-01-09 14:34:57) > On Mon, 16 Dec 2013 13:28:05 +0100 (CET) Thorsten Alteholz > wrote: > >> as opposed to debian/copyright, which states that the license of all >> files is GPLv2, the files in src/* have a license of GPLv2+. Please >> update debian/copyright for the

Bug#732291: files in src/* have license GPLv2+

2014-01-09 Thread Andrew Shadura
Hello, On Mon, 16 Dec 2013 13:28:05 +0100 (CET) Thorsten Alteholz wrote: > as opposed to debian/copyright, which states that the license of all > files is GPLv2, the files in src/* have a license of GPLv2+. Please > update debian/copyright for the new upstream version (1.0.1) > accordingly. I d

Bug#732291: files in src/* have license GPLv2+

2013-12-16 Thread Thorsten Alteholz
Package: osm-gps-map Severity: serious User: alteh...@debian.org Usertags: ftp X-Debbugs-CC: ftpmas...@ftp-master.debian.org thanks Dear Maintainer, as opposed to debian/copyright, which states that the license of all files is GPLv2, the files in src/* have a license of GPLv2+. Please update d