Quoting Andrew Shadura (2014-01-09 16:48:12)
> On Thu, 09 Jan 2014 15:24:59 +0100 Jonas Smedegaard
> wrote:
>>> I don't think it's a bug. If source is distributed as GPL-2+, you're
>>> free to take it as either GPL-2, or any later version. As GPL-2 and
>>> GPL-3 are incompatible, to link agains
Hello,
(First of all, I'm not the maintainer of a package.)
On Thu, 09 Jan 2014 15:24:59 +0100
Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
> > I don't think it's a bug. If source is distributed as GPL-2+,
> > you're free to take it as either GPL-2, or any later version. As
> > GPL-2 and GPL-3 are incompatible, to l
Quoting Andrew Shadura (2014-01-09 14:34:57)
> On Mon, 16 Dec 2013 13:28:05 +0100 (CET) Thorsten Alteholz
> wrote:
>
>> as opposed to debian/copyright, which states that the license of all
>> files is GPLv2, the files in src/* have a license of GPLv2+. Please
>> update debian/copyright for the
Hello,
On Mon, 16 Dec 2013 13:28:05 +0100 (CET)
Thorsten Alteholz wrote:
> as opposed to debian/copyright, which states that the license of all
> files is GPLv2, the files in src/* have a license of GPLv2+. Please
> update debian/copyright for the new upstream version (1.0.1)
> accordingly.
I d
Package: osm-gps-map
Severity: serious
User: alteh...@debian.org
Usertags: ftp
X-Debbugs-CC: ftpmas...@ftp-master.debian.org
thanks
Dear Maintainer,
as opposed to debian/copyright, which states that the license of all files
is GPLv2, the files in src/* have a license of GPLv2+. Please update
d
5 matches
Mail list logo