Bug#731884: Problem is order of partitions seen by mdadm

2013-12-14 Thread NeilBrown
On Sat, 14 Dec 2013 16:38:08 + Ben Hutchings wrote: > Right, I don't think it is correct to look for firmware RAID signatures > inside partitions. Upstream commit 357ac1067835d1cdd5f80acc28501db0ffc64957 NeilBrown signature.asc Description: PGP signature

Bug#731884: Problem is order of partitions seen by mdadm

2013-12-14 Thread Ben Hutchings
On Wed, 2013-12-11 at 14:19 +0100, John Hughes wrote: > When the system works it builds the devices from sda and sdb. > > When it fails its because it tries to build a container from sda3 and sdb. > > To mdadm sda3 looks like it is part of an imsm container, but it's not. > It isn't even a par

Bug#731884: Problem is order of partitions seen by mdadm

2013-12-11 Thread John Hughes
When the system works it builds the devices from sda and sdb. When it fails its because it tries to build a container from sda3 and sdb. To mdadm sda3 looks like it is part of an imsm container, but it's not. It isn't even a partition! sda and sdb contain a imsm raid0 device that is partiti