Hi,
Raphael Hertzog:
> > EFI boot [...] (from an USB key)
me:
> Were the problems with CD/DVD or with USB sticks ?
Please ignore this obsolete question of mine.
Have a nice day :)
Thomas
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". T
Hi,
> It's not about a particular version of xorriso, but about the set of
> command-line options that we use depending on the xorriso version
No regression then. :)
Were the problems with CD/DVD or with USB sticks ?
> In our tests, there are more computers where EFI boot works (from an USB
>
Hi,
On Wed, 10 Dec 2014, Thomas Schmitt wrote:
> How was the result from older xorriso better than from
> the newer one ?
>
> Which particular version produced better, which version
> produced the worse image ?
It's not about a particular version of xorriso, but about the set of
command-line opt
Hi,
Raphaël Hertzog wrote:
> Note that we disabled a test on the xorriso version in use (in binary_iso)
> as we had better results with the old method in use before xorriso gained
> knowledge of registering the EFI image as an alternate eltorrito boot
> record.
Please give me more details about t
Control: tag -1 patch
On Sat, 29 Mar 2014, Daniel Baumann wrote:
> On 03/28/2014 11:00 PM, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
> > I worked on EFI boot support for Kali's live+installer image and
> > this resulted in the attached patch for live-build 3.0.5.
>
> thanks. however, i'm not in favour of merging th
On Mon, 31 Mar 2014, Thomas Schmitt wrote:
> It is rather intended to advertise a HFS+ image for booting Macs
> according to http://mjg59.dreamwidth.org/11285.html .
>
> So my question here too:
> Is there any system known which would demand the EFI image to be
> presented in an Apple Partition M
Hi,
thank you for flying xorriso.
I already asked at debian-cd why the option -isohybrid-apm-hfsplus
is used with a boot image that contains a FAT filesystem.
The option advertises the FAT in an Apple Partition Map as HFS+
partition.
It is rather intended to advertise a HFS+ image for booting Mac
On 03/28/2014 11:00 PM, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
> I worked on EFI boot support for Kali's live+installer image and
> this resulted in the attached patch for live-build 3.0.5.
thanks. however, i'm not in favour of merging that for following reasons:
* it's against 3.x instead of 4.x
* syslinux
Hello,
I worked on EFI boot support for Kali's live+installer image and
this resulted in the attached patch for live-build 3.0.5.
Some comments:
* The patch can't be used as-is because it assumes that syslinux 6
is packaged like syslinux 4 in wheezy (eg almost everything in
syslinux-common).
9 matches
Mail list logo
