Bug#731036: RFS: think-rotate/3.0-1

2013-12-04 Thread Henrique de Moraes Holschuh
On Tue, 03 Dec 2013, Martin Ueding wrote: > > Mostly because the package would not contain the > > majority of the stand-alone thinkpad-specific tools and utils (such as tpb, > > thinkbat, thinkfan, etc). > > That is the problem, it is just screen rotation and docking. “-scripts” > sounds like som

Bug#731036: RFS: think-rotate/3.0-1

2013-12-03 Thread Martin Ueding
> We'd need to ask a lawyer to get an useful answer to that question, I think. The problem is that I do not know a lawyer that I could just ask. And I am German, another dev is American, so I have no idea whether to ask a German or an American lawyer. We already have the name in the description.

Bug#731036: RFS: think-rotate/3.0-1

2013-12-03 Thread Henrique de Moraes Holschuh
On Tue, 03 Dec 2013, Martin Ueding wrote: > Okay, “thinklight” does not count, then. > > The question is, whether using “thinkpad-” would cause any trouble with > trademarks? We'd need to ask a lawyer to get an useful answer to that question, I think. > I think “thinkpad-utils” or “thinkpad-tool

Bug#731036: RFS: think-rotate/3.0-1

2013-12-03 Thread Martin Ueding
Okay, “thinklight” does not count, then. The question is, whether using “thinkpad-” would cause any trouble with trademarks? I think “thinkpad-utils” or “thinkpad-tools” or “thinkpad-scripts” is an improvement. Would those be okay with you? The problem is that it started as a single rotation scr

Bug#731036: RFS: think-rotate/3.0-1

2013-12-03 Thread Henrique de Moraes Holschuh
On Tue, 03 Dec 2013, Martin Ueding wrote: > https://github.com/martin-ueding/think-rotate/issues/26 > > It looks like there is no `thinkpad-` package in Ubuntu or Debian, but > several with `think` in them. Does it really make sense to rename this > to `thinkpad`, when there are other packages lik

Bug#731036: RFS: think-rotate/3.0-1

2013-12-03 Thread Martin Ueding
I talked about this with another developer: https://github.com/martin-ueding/think-rotate/issues/26 It looks like there is no `thinkpad-` package in Ubuntu or Debian, but several with `think` in them. Does it really make sense to rename this to `thinkpad`, when there are other packages like `thin

Bug#731036: RFS: think-rotate/3.0-1

2013-12-02 Thread Martin Ueding
`thinkpad-rotate` makes more sense, indeed. However, it is probably not a good idea to have the Debian package and upstream project with slightly different names. So changing the upstream name is probably something that I should consider as well. I was thinking about `lenovo-rotate` as well, or `*

Bug#731036: RFS: think-rotate/3.0-1

2013-12-02 Thread Henrique de Moraes Holschuh
On Sun, 01 Dec 2013, Martin Ueding wrote: > * Package name: think-rotate Could you be persuaded to name this thinkpad-rotate ? -- "One disk to rule them all, One disk to find them. One disk to bring them all and in the darkness grind them. In the Land of Redmond where the shadows lie.

Bug#731036: RFS: think-rotate/3.0-1

2013-12-01 Thread Martin Ueding
Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: wishlist Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "think-rotate" * Package name: think-rotate Version : 3.0-1 Upstream Author : [fill in name and email of upstream] * URL : [fill in URL of upstreams web site]