On 4 March 2014 01:54, Vagrant Cascadian wrote:
> Control: severity 730833 important
>
> On Tue, Feb 18, 2014 at 11:19:29PM +, Robert Millan wrote:
>> On 18/02/2014 21:54, Vagrant Cascadian wrote:
>> > On Tue, Feb 18, 2014 at 09:35:09PM +, Robert Millan wrote:
>> >> On 18/02/2014 19:11, Va
Control: severity 730833 important
On Tue, Feb 18, 2014 at 11:19:29PM +, Robert Millan wrote:
> On 18/02/2014 21:54, Vagrant Cascadian wrote:
> > On Tue, Feb 18, 2014 at 09:35:09PM +, Robert Millan wrote:
> >> On 18/02/2014 19:11, Vagrant Cascadian wrote:
> > If the best thing is to drop n
On 18/02/2014 21:54, Vagrant Cascadian wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 18, 2014 at 09:35:09PM +, Robert Millan wrote:
>> On 18/02/2014 19:11, Vagrant Cascadian wrote:
>>> Looking for help from the *bsd porters on this... We haven't seen a
>>> successful build of u-boot on kfreebsd since mid-2012...
>>>
>>
On Tue, Feb 18, 2014 at 09:35:09PM +, Robert Millan wrote:
> On 18/02/2014 19:11, Vagrant Cascadian wrote:
> > Looking for help from the *bsd porters on this... We haven't seen a
> > successful build of u-boot on kfreebsd since mid-2012...
> >
> > The short of it is a bunch of header files tha
On 18/02/2014 19:11, Vagrant Cascadian wrote:
> Looking for help from the *bsd porters on this... We haven't seen a
> successful build of u-boot on kfreebsd since mid-2012...
>
> The short of it is a bunch of header files that aren't present on Debian
> GNU/kFreeBSD are required for building u-boo
Looking for help from the *bsd porters on this... We haven't seen a
successful build of u-boot on kfreebsd since mid-2012...
The short of it is a bunch of header files that aren't present on Debian
GNU/kFreeBSD are required for building u-boot-tools. Upstream u-boot has
essentially copied a bunch
On Mon, Dec 16, 2013 at 08:43:05AM +, Ian Campbell wrote:
[..]
>
> Are you sure it is our source package and not the upstream which
> contains this?
>
> I don't see a Debian patch which adds this stuff.
>
> I think a better approach here would be to work with the upstream u-boot
> project to
On Mon, Dec 16, 2013 at 08:43:05AM +, Ian Campbell wrote:
> On Fri, 2013-12-13 at 13:18 -0800, Ryan Niebur wrote:
> I think a better approach here would be to work with the upstream u-boot
> project to make things more portable -- perhaps by replacing the use of
> linux/types.h (which is surely
On Fri, 2013-12-13 at 13:18 -0800, Ryan Niebur wrote:
> diff -Nru u-boot-2013.10/debian/patches/add_asm_posix_types_header_files.diff
> u-boot-2013.10/debian/patches/add_asm_posix_types_header_files.diff
> --- u-boot-2013.10/debian/patches/add_asm_posix_types_header_files.diff
> 1970-01-01 01:00:
Attached is a more proper patch.
On Fri, Nov 29, 2013 at 04:14:31PM -0800, Ryan Niebur wrote:
> Source: u-boot
> Version: 2013.10-3
> Severity: important
> Tags: patch
>
> Hello,
>
> Description of problem:
>
> Attached is a quilt patch which will allow this package to build on
> kfreebsd, whic
Source: u-boot
Version: 2013.10-3
Severity: important
Tags: patch
Hello,
Description of problem:
Attached is a quilt patch which will allow this package to build on
kfreebsd, which was obtained by brute force. Here is the failure:
https://buildd.debian.org/status/fetch.php?pkg=u-boot&arch=kfreeb
11 matches
Mail list logo
