On Tue, Nov 12, 2013 at 03:27:07PM -0600, Peter Samuelson wrote:
> [Wouter Bolsterlee]
> > svn: E200029: Couldn't perform atomic initialization
> > svn: E200030: SQLite compiled for 3.8.0.2, but running with
> > 3.7.13
>
> Thanks. The problem is that there's 3 different op
Peter Samuelson schreef op di 12-11-2013 om 15:27 [-0600]:
> [...]
> It's been suggested we use runtime detection of SQLite features in
> libsvn1, but that's not really convenient: if I remember correctly, the
> build process involves compiling SQL queries which may use newer SQLite
> features. I'
reassign 729426 libsvn1
forcemerge 721878 729426
thanks
[Wouter Bolsterlee]
> svn: E200029: Couldn't perform atomic initialization
> svn: E200030: SQLite compiled for 3.8.0.2, but running with
> 3.7.13
Thanks. The problem is that there's 3 different opinions on this
depe
Package: subversion
Hi,
It seems the subversion dependency on libsqlite3-0 (via libsvn1) needs
tighter versioning. Currently a mismatch can result in errors like
these:
svn: E200029: Couldn't perform atomic initialization
svn: E200030: SQLite compiled for 3.8.0.2, but running wit
4 matches
Mail list logo