Bug#728535: which size increment to expect

2013-11-20 Thread Bjørn Mork
Geert Stappers writes: > Op 2013-11-17 om 11:15 schreef Geert Stappers: >> Op 2013-11-17 om 10:55 schreef Geert Stappers: >> > >> > Edit on the kernel module source file, to add USB ID. >> > >> > Executed `fakeroot debian/rules binary-arh >> > Produced a same size .ko, but it should be bigger du

Bug#728535: which size increment to expect

2013-11-20 Thread Geert Stappers
Op 2013-11-17 om 11:15 schreef Geert Stappers: > Op 2013-11-17 om 10:55 schreef Geert Stappers: > > > > Edit on the kernel module source file, to add USB ID. > > > > Executed `fakeroot debian/rules binary-arh > > Produced a same size .ko, but it should be bigger due the extra USB ID > > Is it co

Bug#728535: which size increment to expect

2013-11-17 Thread Bastian Blank
On Sun, Nov 17, 2013 at 11:15:13AM +0100, Geert Stappers wrote: > Op 2013-11-17 om 10:55 schreef Geert Stappers: > > Edit on the kernel module source file, to add USB ID. > > Executed `fakeroot debian/rules binary-arh > > Produced a same size .ko, but it should be bigger due the extra USB ID > Is i

Bug#728535: which size increment to expect

2013-11-17 Thread Geert Stappers
Op 2013-11-17 om 10:55 schreef Geert Stappers: > > Edit on the kernel module source file, to add USB ID. > > Executed `fakeroot debian/rules binary-arh > Produced a same size .ko, but it should be bigger due the extra USB ID Is it correct to expect an increase in size of the .ko with a few bytes