On 29/10/13 11:45, Ximin Luo wrote:
> On 29/10/13 10:24, Jakub Wilk wrote:
>> Your clean target unapplies all the patches.
>>
>
> That is still done independently of architecture, so I don't see why that
> would
> cause this bug.
>
> I don't believe it's incorrect to un-apply the patches during
* Ximin Luo , 2013-10-29, 11:45:
debian/patches/dont-install-config-h.patch would be the cause of this, but
this file is unconditionally applied in all architectures, so I'm not sure
how you ended up not applying it on i386.
Your clean target unapplies all the patches.
That is still done ind
On 29/10/13 10:24, Jakub Wilk wrote:
> * Ximin Luo , 2013-10-28, 14:11:
>>> libcurlpp-dev is marked as "Multi-Arch: same", but the following file is
>>> architecture-dependent:
>>>
>>> /usr/include/curlpp/Types.hpp
>>>
>>> An example diff between i386 and amd64 is attached.
>>
>> Are you sure you b
* Ximin Luo , 2013-10-28, 14:11:
libcurlpp-dev is marked as "Multi-Arch: same", but the following file is
architecture-dependent:
/usr/include/curlpp/Types.hpp
An example diff between i386 and amd64 is attached.
Are you sure you built this correctly?
I didn't build the package, buildds did
On 28/10/13 12:24, Jakub Wilk wrote:
> Package: libcurlpp-dev
> Version: 0.7.3-3
> Severity: important
> User: multiarch-de...@lists.alioth.debian.org
> Usertags: multiarch
>
> libcurlpp-dev is marked as "Multi-Arch: same", but the following file is
> architecture-dependent:
>
> /usr/include/cur
Package: libcurlpp-dev
Version: 0.7.3-3
Severity: important
User: multiarch-de...@lists.alioth.debian.org
Usertags: multiarch
libcurlpp-dev is marked as "Multi-Arch: same", but the following file is
architecture-dependent:
/usr/include/curlpp/Types.hpp
An example diff between i386 and amd64 i
6 matches
Mail list logo
