Dear Vincent,
> One last nitpick (sorry!) is that other gnome-shell extensions
> packaged in Debian seem to prefix their packages with
> "gnome-shell-extension-" (e.g. gnome-shell-extension-weather,
> gnome-shell-extension-autohidetopbar), so can you please do the same
> for your binary package a
On Sun, Feb 2, 2014 at 2:01 AM, Joseph Herlant wrote:
> Dear Vincent,
>
> I first understood that I needed --with quilt and then lintian was
> complaining about a missing build-dep for quilt. That's why I added
> them.
> But I doubled checked, tested on the package and you're right I don't
> need
Dear Vincent,
I first understood that I needed --with quilt and then lintian was
complaining about a missing build-dep for quilt. That's why I added
them.
But I doubled checked, tested on the package and you're right I don't
need this! <:-)
That's great, I removed them.
Yep, you guessed why pri
On Thu, Jan 30, 2014 at 12:25 PM, Joseph Herlant wrote:
> Hi Vincent,
>
> Thanks for this advice. :-)
>
> I chose to use the patching approach because I found it cleaner (and
> wanted to play with quilt once again!).
> I recreated the package from the upstream 0.8 tag and used quilt to
> integrate
Hi Vincent,
Thanks for this advice. :-)
I chose to use the patching approach because I found it cleaner (and
wanted to play with quilt once again!).
I recreated the package from the upstream 0.8 tag and used quilt to
integrate the fixes in one patch.
Package have been uploaded to mentors.
Please
On Wed, Jan 29, 2014 at 12:59 PM, Joseph Herlant wrote:
> retitle 728059 RFS: gnome-shell-pomodoro/0.8.0-1 [ITP]
> thanks
>
>
> Dear Vincent,
>
> Thanks a lot for your advises and your time.
>
>
>
>> Yes, use "all" instead. "any" will cause your package to be compiled
>> on all Debian release arch
retitle 728059 RFS: gnome-shell-pomodoro/0.8.0-1 [ITP]
thanks
Dear Vincent,
Thanks a lot for your advises and your time.
> Yes, use "all" instead. "any" will cause your package to be compiled
> on all Debian release architectures and introduce different binary
> packages of gnome-shell-pomodo
Hi Joseph,
On Mon, Jan 20, 2014 at 2:33 PM, Joseph Herlant wrote:
>> - Why "Architecture: any" if there aren't any arch-specific files in
>> your package?
>
> As it means any architecture supported by debian and that it is the "most
> frequently used" regarding debina policy 5.6.8. I thought it
Hi Vincent,
Thanks for the quick answer.
> How is this different from gnome-shell-timer, which is already
> packaged in debian?
The difference is that it uses pomodoro technique. It's not just a timer.
For more information about the pomodoro technique, you can begin with
the readme of the packag
Control: tag -1 moreinfo
On Fri, Jan 17, 2014 at 9:40 AM, Joseph Herlant wrote:
> Hi Vincent,
>
> Thanks for the suggestion for the usage of the Breaks keyword. I personally
> prefer to do as the gnome-shell-extensions do which is adding "gnome-shell
> (>= 3.8), gnome-shell (<< 3.9)" to the packa
Hi Vincent,
Thanks for the suggestion for the usage of the Breaks keyword. I personally
prefer to do as the gnome-shell-extensions do which is adding "gnome-shell
(>= 3.8), gnome-shell (<< 3.9)" to the package. I'll update the package
accordingly for the next release.
For the integration of the g
On Wed, Oct 30, 2013 at 2:16 PM, Joseph Herlant wrote:
> Package: sponsorship-requests
> Severity: wishlist
>
>
> Dear mentors,
>
> I repackaged the gnome-shell-pomodoro to support gnome-shell-3.8 (to
> work with unstable).
>
> I am now looking for a sponsor for my package "gnome-shell-pomodoro"
>
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: wishlist
Dear mentors,
I repackaged the gnome-shell-pomodoro to support gnome-shell-3.8 (to
work with unstable).
I am now looking for a sponsor for my package "gnome-shell-pomodoro"
* Package name: gnome-shell-pomodoro
Version : 0.8.0-1
U
13 matches
Mail list logo
