On Thu, 2014-08-14 at 02:52 +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> On Thu, 2013-11-14 at 10:34 +, Ian Campbell wrote:
[...]
> I've now added something along these lines.
Thanks, I'd totally lost track of this one.
Ian.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a sub
On Thu, 2013-11-14 at 10:34 +, Ian Campbell wrote:
> On Mon, 2013-11-04 at 03:36 +, Ben Hutchings wrote:
>
> > OK, please can someone provide text for this? Note it will need to go
> > in the meta-packages built by linux-latest, not the kernel image
> > packages themselves, because apt-sho
On Mon, 2013-11-04 at 03:36 +, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> OK, please can someone provide text for this? Note it will need to go
> in the meta-packages built by linux-latest, not the kernel image
> packages themselves, because apt-showchanges never shows NEWS for a
> new binary package.
Not sure i
On Fri, 2013-11-01 at 10:33 +, Ian Campbell wrote:
> On Sat, 2013-10-26 at 05:40 +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> > On Sat, 2013-10-26 at 06:27 +0200, Bastian Blank wrote:
> > > On Sat, Oct 26, 2013 at 05:18:56AM +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> > > > I think this is just like missing hardware suppor
On Sat, 2013-10-26 at 05:40 +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> On Sat, 2013-10-26 at 06:27 +0200, Bastian Blank wrote:
> > On Sat, Oct 26, 2013 at 05:18:56AM +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> > > I think this is just like missing hardware support, which we consider an
> > > important bug. And it's also a r
On Sat, Oct 26, 2013 at 05:40:36AM +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> On Sat, 2013-10-26 at 06:27 +0200, Bastian Blank wrote:
> > On Sat, Oct 26, 2013 at 05:18:56AM +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> > > I think this is just like missing hardware support, which we consider an
> > > important bug. And it's a
On Sat, Oct 26, 2013 at 05:40:36AM +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> On Sat, 2013-10-26 at 06:27 +0200, Bastian Blank wrote:
> > On Sat, Oct 26, 2013 at 05:18:56AM +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> > > I think this is just like missing hardware support, which we consider an
> > > important bug. And it's a
On Sat, 2013-10-26 at 06:27 +0200, Bastian Blank wrote:
> On Sat, Oct 26, 2013 at 05:18:56AM +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> > I think this is just like missing hardware support, which we consider an
> > important bug. And it's also a regression in support.
>
> There is no hardware involved.
If so
On Sat, Oct 26, 2013 at 05:18:56AM +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> I think this is just like missing hardware support, which we consider an
> important bug. And it's also a regression in support.
There is no hardware involved.
> I don't know whether it is important enough to justify using less
> e
On Sat, 2013-10-26 at 05:57 +0200, Bastian Blank wrote:
> On Sat, Oct 26, 2013 at 01:12:56AM +0300, Regid Ichira wrote:
> > This version depends on linux-image-3.10-3-686-pae. I am the
> > client of a xen provider. Unfortuntely, because of that I don't have
> > many details. I think there is a
On Sat, Oct 26, 2013 at 01:12:56AM +0300, Regid Ichira wrote:
> This version depends on linux-image-3.10-3-686-pae. I am the
> client of a xen provider. Unfortuntely, because of that I don't have
> many details. I think there is a similar problem with both Amazon
> Web Service, and another pro
Package: linux-image-686-pae
Version: 3.10+52
Severity: normal
This version depends on linux-image-3.10-3-686-pae. I am the
client of a xen provider. Unfortuntely, because of that I don't have
many details. I think there is a similar problem with both Amazon
Web Service, and another provide
12 matches
Mail list logo
