* Andreas Metzler (ametz...@bebt.de) [140119 19:18]:
> could you provide a little bit of background why you consider both
> "Systemd on Linux, openrc/sysv-rc on non-Linux" and "Upstart
> everywhere" viable long-term but not "systemd on Linux and upstart on
> !Linux"?
Because upstart won't surviv
On Sun, Jan 19, 2014 at 10:27 AM, Steven Chamberlain
wrote:
On 19/01/14 18:15, Andreas Metzler wrote:
could you provide a little bit of background why you consider both
"Systemd on Linux, openrc/sysv-rc on non-Linux" and "Upstart
everywhere" viable long-term but not "systemd on Linux and up
On 19/01/14 18:15, Andreas Metzler wrote:
> could you provide a little bit of background why you consider both
> "Systemd on Linux, openrc/sysv-rc on non-Linux" and "Upstart
> everywhere" viable long-term but not "systemd on Linux and upstart on
> !Linux"?
As a porter, I'd slightly prefer we swit
On 2014-01-19 Andreas Barth wrote:
[...]
> On the linux ports, all would work. On the kbsd ports I believe that both
> upstart and openrc could be working, but none is yet. For hurd, at least
> openrc could and probably also upstart.
>
> Porting systemd to kbsd or hurd is not realistic from what
Hi together,
first of all, sorry for being so late to this party.
I'll start with describing a few facts, observations and thoughts, and come
to my conclusions at the end of this mail. I don't write references at
places where I believe had already sufficient coverage by others and/or are
more or
5 matches
Mail list logo
