> Were you able to try applying this patch?
Yes, it seems working (start/stop/restart tested) for few days.
See attached patch.
>From 37fb75461c7102617fedd9f270baaf8fe32bcbaa Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Sergey B Kirpichev
Date: Mon, 23 Dec 2013 19:11:30 +0400
Subject: [PATCH 1/2] Add a -p opt
On Mon, Dec 16, 2013 at 01:26:27PM -0300, Dererk wrote:
> Would you mind reviewing this patch and telling me if it provides the
> same functionality as yours did?
> http://sources.gentoo.org/cgi-bin/viewvc.cgi/gentoo-x86/net-misc/openntpd/files/openntpd-20080406-pidfile.patch
Yes, it looks so. I'
On 15/12/13 12:14, Sergey B Kirpichev wrote:
> On Sun, Dec 15, 2013 at 11:58:36AM -0300, Dererk wrote:
>> The reasons for openntpd not carrying this patch (above from it no
>> longer applies after the large ntp_adjtime/adjtimex changes), is that I
>> considered at that moment it was no longer requi
On Sun, Dec 15, 2013 at 11:58:36AM -0300, Dererk wrote:
> The reasons for openntpd not carrying this patch (above from it no
> longer applies after the large ntp_adjtime/adjtimex changes), is that I
> considered at that moment it was no longer required because of the
> initscript resting on "pidof
On 17/10/13 15:22, Sergey B Kirpichev wrote:
> Package: openntpd
> Severity: normal
> Version: 20080406p-4
>
> Hello,
>
> Why you have *silently* dropped 05-pid.patch? It was a
> Debian-specific patch, introduced for reason (see #354825).
Hi Sergey!
First of all, please accept my sincere apologie
Package: openntpd
Severity: normal
Version: 20080406p-4
Hello,
Why you have *silently* dropped 05-pid.patch? It was a
Debian-specific patch, introduced for reason (see #354825).
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Con
6 matches
Mail list logo
