tags 726248 pending
thanks
On 19/01/2014 08:53, Samuel Bronson wrote:
> Hmm, I must have thought this was covered well enough in:
>
> http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=726248#110
>
> But I guess that left out the detail that Replaces is supposed to be
> accompanied by Breaks (or C
Robert Millan writes:
> What's wrong with Replaces: ? I proposed this in my last mail, but it
> went unanswered:
>
> http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=726248#105
>
> I really don't see why you want us to remove legacy functionality from
> k-k-h. As far as I can see its presence doe
Hi Samuel,
On 06/01/2014 00:59, Samuel Bronson wrote:
> Given the facts:
>
> - nobody has ported the dtrace userspace to [e]glibc yet
>
> - there *are* packages that could benefit from systemtap's version of
> ; in particular, GDB can use such probes, and has
> particular support
3 matches
Mail list logo
