Hi Michael,
Michael Biebl writes:
>> Should we also chmod 644 existing files in i-s-h's postinst?
>
> When upgrading i-s-h from older, "buggy" versions. Something along the
> lines like
>
> if dpkg --compare-versions "$2" lt "1.9"; then
> # chmod stuff
> fi
Excellent point. This is done with
ht
Am 12.09.2013 12:32, schrieb Michael Biebl:
> Should we also chmod 644 existing files in i-s-h's postinst?
When upgrading i-s-h from older, "buggy" versions. Something along the
lines like
if dpkg --compare-versions "$2" lt "1.9"; then
# chmod stuff
fi
--
Why is it that all of the instrument
Hi,
Am 12.09.2013 07:08, schrieb Michael Stapelberg:
> Good catch! Our switch to using File::Temp for making the
> modifications atomic has caused this — the File::Temp module explicitly
> chmods the files to 0600.
>
> This is fixed in commit
> http://anonscm.debian.org/gitweb/?p=collab-maint/ini
control: tags -1 + pending
Hi Michael,
Michael Biebl writes:
> On second though, I'd say this is a bug in init-system-helpers. It
> should create those files as readable to unpriviledged users. Those
> files don't have confidential information which aren't readable anyway
> by looking at /etc/sy
reassign 722524 init-system-helpers
retitle 722524 i-s-h: make state files readable for regular users
found 722524 1.8
thanks
Am 12.09.2013 01:15, schrieb Michael Biebl:
> Package: systemd
> Version: 204-3
> Severity: important
>
> When running reportbug as regular user (which hopefully most peop
5 matches
Mail list logo
