On Wed, Jun 03, 2015 at 08:30:58AM -0400, Stephen M. Webb wrote:
> Any progress? It's been 10 months and no upload yet.
>
> As an upstream maintainer I'm perfectly willing to take over this work: we
> regularly build against sid anyway.
>
> --
> Stephen M. Webb
>
We are still actively work
Any progress? It's been 10 months and no upload yet.
As an upstream maintainer I'm perfectly willing to take over this work: we
regularly build against sid anyway.
--
Stephen M. Webb
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
> Le 17/12/2014 17:25, Stephen M. Webb a écrit :
>What is the current status of this? The package has not been uploaded to
>experimental yet.
>
>Where is the Debianized source? The source at
>http://anonscm.debian.org/cgit/pkg-a11y/compiz.git/ doesn't look like it
>would build on ARM or run on a
Hello:
I had been working on a compiz package for the Debian X Strike Force
team a few years back but they were never interested. I based it on
their git repository and have been updating it since before compiz was
removed from Debian.
The package is in here
https://github.com/micove/compiz
It b
Hi,
I'll let ksamak to answer when he goes back from holiday, as he
packaged. In my remember, he submitted the package to a mentor who
didn't have the time to look at it. I cannot remember if he submitted
this in our own repo or in alioth. Anyway, I know he did a quite
important work so that
What is the current status of this? The package has not been uploaded to
experimental yet.
Where is the Debianized source? The source at
http://anonscm.debian.org/cgit/pkg-a11y/compiz.git/ doesn't look like it
would build on ARM or run on any architecture (because it's missing multiarch
change
On Wed, 22 Oct 2014 23:12:31 +0200 Samuel Thibault wrote:
>
> > Moreover, the Compiz which is about being packaged has important changes,
> > intended to make it a good a11y tool. It's at least what I understood from
> > Knoppix's release.
>
It should be noted that the packaging for sid has bee
MENGUAL Jean-Philippe, le Wed 22 Oct 2014 22:25:36 +0200, a écrit :
> Is it optimal to create a group for a single packages?
It's not a single package, we have to package a few things like
libwnckmm, compiz, emerald, etc.
> Moreover, the Compiz which is about being packaged has important changes,
Is it optimal to create a group for a single packages? Usually, groups
handle themes or several packages.
Moreover, the Compiz which is about being packaged has important
changes, intended to make it a good a11y tool. It's at least what I
understood from Knoppix's release.
That's why persona
Stephen M. Webb, le Wed 22 Oct 2014 13:49:59 -0400, a écrit :
> > Well, we can also give you access to the pkg-a11y project.
>
> It just doesn't make much sense to me that a major window manager
> would be a subproject of the a11y team.
Ok, then fine :)
It just happens that a couple of years ago
> Well, we can also give you access to the pkg-a11y project.
It just doesn't make much sense to me that a major window manager
would be a subproject of the a11y team.
A separate team makes it easier for additional upstream Compiz
developers to participate in maintaining the Debian packaging, and
Stephen M. Webb, le Wed 22 Oct 2014 10:51:22 -0400, a écrit :
> I think the best approach is to create a Compiz packaging team at
> Alioth and host all of the Debian packaging there:
Well, we can also give you access to the pkg-a11y project.
> that way, we (upstream Compiz) as team members can ke
I'm very interested in minimizing the delta between Ubuntu packaging
of Compiz and Debian packaging of Compiz. I think the best approach
is to create a Compiz packaging team at Alioth and host all of the
Debian packaging there: that way, we (upstream Compiz) as team
members can keep the Debian pa
13 matches
Mail list logo
