Bug#720891: cpm: fails to start on i386

2014-10-11 Thread Russ Allbery
Kacper Wysocki writes: > I simply cannot reproduce this. > We might have fixed it at some point between 0.28 and 0.31? > CPM runs as expected on 32-bit jessie: Yes, that's quite possible. I'm afraid I can no longer check -- I no longer have any i386 unstable/testing systems. (They're all run

Bug#720891: cpm: fails to start on i386

2014-10-03 Thread Kacper Wysocki
On 02/04/2014 06:27 PM, Kacper Wysocki wrote: >>> Does the problem still occur with git master branch tip revision? >> >> I'm afraid so. I just tried again against >> 9cc7f9757f140f10999bb364bbca3fcc5a46 on a Debian i386 jessie system, >> and I got the same results: >> >> windlord:~/tmp/cpm> .

Bug#720891: cpm: fails to start on i386

2014-02-04 Thread Kacper Wysocki
>> Does the problem still occur with git master branch tip revision? > > I'm afraid so. I just tried again against > 9cc7f9757f140f10999bb364bbca3fcc5a46 on a Debian i386 jessie system, > and I got the same results: > > windlord:~/tmp/cpm> ./cpm > Cannot drop root privileges. (695) Dang it.

Bug#720891: cpm: fails to start on i386

2014-02-02 Thread Russ Allbery
Kacper Wysocki writes: > On 08/27/2013 06:34 AM, Russ Allbery wrote: >> The patch makes the warning about the kernel version go away, but cpm >> still won't start. It just exits after reporting the error: >> Cannot drop root privileges. (689) >> This is running cpm out of the build tree after

Bug#720891: cpm: fails to start on i386

2014-01-06 Thread Kacper Wysocki
On 08/27/2013 06:34 AM, Russ Allbery wrote: > The patch makes the warning about the kernel version go away, but cpm > still won't start. It just exits after reporting the error: > > Cannot drop root privileges. (689) > > This is running cpm out of the build tree after compiling it as a regular >

Bug#720891: cpm: fails to start on i386

2013-08-30 Thread Kacper Wysocki
On 08/27/2013 06:34 AM, Russ Allbery wrote: > Kacper Wysocki writes: >> Although this is a priority, it should not break all i386 systems. >> Please try out the following patch and see if it fixes the issue: > > The patch makes the warning about the kernel version go away, but cpm > still won't s

Bug#720891: cpm: fails to start on i386

2013-08-26 Thread Russ Allbery
Kacper Wysocki writes: > Actually, it's not the architecture, but your kernel release which is > the likely cause for this failure. Well, while you're most likely correct, I'll mention that it works fine on my amd64 system but not on my i386 system, both of which have close to the same kernel ve

Bug#720891: cpm: fails to start on i386

2013-08-26 Thread Kacper Wysocki
Severity: normal On 08/26/2013 04:52 AM, Russ Allbery wrote: > Package: cpm > Version: 0.28-1 > Severity: grave > Justification: renders package unusable > > cpm 0.28-1 fails to start at all on i386 systems. No matter how it > is run, it just produces the errors: > > Failed to scan kernel relea

Bug#720891: cpm: fails to start on i386

2013-08-25 Thread Russ Allbery
Package: cpm Version: 0.28-1 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable cpm 0.28-1 fails to start at all on i386 systems. No matter how it is run, it just produces the errors: Failed to scan kernel release. (Success, 0) Cannot drop root privileges. (684) It does work on amd64. I a