Hey Stefano,
Stefano Zacchiroli [2013-08-30 15:10 +0200]:
> And I wonder if we couldn't have better support for it at a different
> level. All in all, the need of the suggested feature seems to be
> justified by the desire to avoid duplication of information which is
> already written elsewhere (n
On Sun, Aug 25, 2013 at 04:46:20PM +0200, Martin Pitt wrote:
> Ansgar Burchardt [2013-08-22 9:24 +0200]:
> > Depends: @, ${source:Build-Depends}
> >
> > This would be useful for Perl modules where the test suite is already run at
> > build time. Otherwise one would have to maintain another copy
On Sun, 25 Aug 2013 16:46:20 +0200, Martin Pitt wrote:
> Also, I guess most of the build dependencies shouldn't be needed for
> those, as you don't actually need to build these packages? (You need
> to take care to not run the tests against the source tree module,
> after all).
Most Perl modules
Hello Ansgar,
Ansgar Burchardt [2013-08-22 9:24 +0200]:
> Depends: @, ${source:Build-Depends}
>
> This would be useful for Perl modules where the test suite is already run at
> build time. Otherwise one would have to maintain another copy of those
> dependencies: there are alread build, test a
On Thu, Aug 22, 2013 at 09:24:00AM +0200, Ansgar Burchardt wrote:
> Package: autopkgtest
> Version: 2.3.2
> Severity: normal
>
> Tests should be able to depend on the Build-Depends to be installed when they
> are run, e.g. using
>
> Depends: @, ${source:Build-Depends}
>
> This would be useful
Package: autopkgtest
Version: 2.3.2
Severity: normal
Tests should be able to depend on the Build-Depends to be installed when they
are run, e.g. using
Depends: @, ${source:Build-Depends}
This would be useful for Perl modules where the test suite is already run at
build time. Otherwise one woul
6 matches
Mail list logo
