On Thu, 17 Jul 2014 18:42:27 +0800, YunQiang Su wrote:
> I am consider NMU it.
> Any objection?
No need to ask for explicit permission to perform an NMU, ie. to help
others :)
In other words: please go ahead, and thanks in advance.
Cheers,
gregor
--
.''`. Homepage: http://info.comodo.priv
I am consider NMU it.
Any objection?
--
YunQiang Su
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Hi,
I met the same ftbfs problem on mips64el, I tried your patch, it works well.
I also test it on amd64 and i386, all build success.
Regards,
Sphinx
On Wed, 23 Oct 2013 16:45:46 +0200, Matthias Klose wrote:
> patch at
> http://launchpadlibrarian.net/154802668/csh_20110502-2ubuntu1_20110502-2ubuntu2.diff.gz
A different approach would be to use the rather new bmake debhelper
buildsystem (which also ignores tests).
Debdiff attached.
Cheers,
gr
Control: tags -1 + patch
patch at
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/154802668/csh_20110502-2ubuntu1_20110502-2ubuntu2.diff.gz
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Source: csh
Version: 20110502-2
Severity: serious
Tags: jessie sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20130726 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[1]: Enterin
6 matches
Mail list logo