On Tue, May 10, 2016 at 02:10:58PM +0300, Vlad Orlov wrote:
> > Also, packages should normally depend on the full 'perl'
> > package rather than perl-base (see the Perl policy).
>
> Well, in my Debian Testing installation I've looked at a package that
> properly depends
> on 'perl', not on 'per
Hi,
> Also, packages should normally depend on the full 'perl'
> package rather than perl-base (see the Perl policy).
Well, in my Debian Testing installation I've looked at a package that properly
depends
on 'perl', not on 'perl-base', but it's indirectly affected by this issue
anyway...
$ LC_
On Fri, Aug 29, 2014 at 01:20:09PM +0400, Vlad Orlov wrote:
> Isn't this fixed already in perl 5.20, just like
> https://bugs.debian.org/717881 ?
No, perl-base doesn't have a Multi-Arch annotation yet.
It's Essential:yes, so dependencies on it are generally left out
altogether. Also, packages sho
Isn't this fixed already in perl 5.20, just like
https://bugs.debian.org/717881 ?
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Package: perl-base
Version: 5.18.2-7
Followup-For: Bug #717882
Dear Maintainer,
it could be great to convert perl-base to multi-arch (either allowed or
foreign).
This could allow to install "linux-tools" as multi-arch.
Matthieu
-- System Information:
Debian Release: jessie/sid
APT prefers u
Package: perl-base
Version: 5.14.2-21
Severity: normal
Dear Maintainer,
Please convert perl-base to multiarch.
It should probably end up being multiarch=allowed so packages that depend
on it can decide whether they need access to the ABI for their
architecture ('perl-base' dependency) or whether
6 matches
Mail list logo
