Hi Thomas
On 28/07/13 04:09, Thomas Goirand wrote:
So, would you guys agree to switch to to Apache-2.0 for the whole of the
package, or at least license the patch under Apache-2.0 (but I think
that's bad practice and would prefer that the whole of the package is
switched to Apache-2.0)?
Probab
Hi,
The package has been rejected by the FTP masters, because the python
module Warlock is licensed under the Apache-2.0 license, while the
packaging is under GPL. This creates a bad situation if we start
patching upstream code, with a mix of license in it. Let me cut/past the
exact quote from Pau
2 matches
Mail list logo
