Control: tags -1 = upstream fixed-upstream patch
Hello,
On Wednesday 17 of July 2013 14:34:26 Brad King wrote:
> On 07/17/2013 07:15 AM, Modestas Vainius wrote:
> > Yes, I do. I fail to see why you would point me to it. Just to be clear,
> > I'm NOT against fixing this bug, I'm against fixing thi
On 07/17/2013 07:15 AM, Modestas Vainius wrote:
> Yes, I do. I fail to see why you would point me to it. Just to be clear, I'm
> NOT against fixing this bug, I'm against fixing this bug via Debian patch.
> That's it.
>
> So either you report it upstream (which will be faster), or I will do it
>
Hello,
On Wednesday 17 of July 2013 12:05:03 Mathieu Malaterre wrote:
> Control: severity -1 important
What's a reason you play BTS ping pong with me? Changing severity with no
additional justification won't change my opinion.
> On Wed, Jul 17, 2013 at 11:58 AM, Modestas Vainius wrote:
> > On
Control: severity -1 important
On Wed, Jul 17, 2013 at 11:58 AM, Modestas Vainius wrote:
> On Wednesday 17 of July 2013 11:42:12 Mathieu Malaterre wrote:
>> By default ctest -T MemCheck runs:
>>
>> 35: MemCheck command: /usr/bin/valgrind "-q" "--tool=memcheck"
>> "--leak-check=yes" "--show-reacha
Control: severity -1 normal
Control: tags -1 upstream wontfix
Hello,
On Wednesday 17 of July 2013 11:42:12 Mathieu Malaterre wrote:
> By default ctest -T MemCheck runs:
>
> 35: MemCheck command: /usr/bin/valgrind "-q" "--tool=memcheck"
> "--leak-check=yes" "--show-reachable=yes" "--workaround-gc
Package: cmake
Severity: important
By default ctest -T MemCheck runs:
35: MemCheck command: /usr/bin/valgrind "-q" "--tool=memcheck"
"--leak-check=yes" "--show-reachable=yes" "--workaround-gcc296-bugs=yes"
"--num-callers=50"
However as per documentation:
When enabled, assume that reads and wr
6 matches
Mail list logo
