On Jul 21, Simon Lodal wrote:
> The functionality was there in squeeze. Could you point me to a changelog
> entry that describes when it was removed, and why?
If it worked in squeeze for some hypervisor then it was an error which
has been corrected.
--
ciao,
Marco
signature.asc
Description:
> > I WANT to rename the interfaces.
> >
> > I can create 70-persistent-net.rules manually, then it works perfectly.
> > But
>
> And it is how it is supposed to work
Says who?
Not the man page for sure.
The functionality was there in squeeze. Could you point me to a changelog
entry that descr
On Jul 21, Simon Lodal wrote:
> I WANT to rename the interfaces.
>
> I can create 70-persistent-net.rules manually, then it works perfectly. But
And it is how it is supposed to work, because your case is highly
uncommon.
--
ciao,
Marco
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
> On Jul 20, Simon Lodal wrote:
> > No this is a bug. Why should interface renaming not work in virtual
> > machines?
> Because their names are already stable.
You missed the point.
I WANT to rename the interfaces.
I can create 70-persistent-net.rules manually, then it works perfectly. But
why
On Jul 20, Simon Lodal wrote:
> No this is a bug. Why should interface renaming not work in virtual machines?
Because their names are already stable.
--
ciao,
Marco
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
No this is a bug. Why should interface renaming not work in virtual machines?
I have the same problem. For various reasons we have always renamed our
network interfaces to e0, e1, etc, both in physical and virtual machines
(kvm). What is wwrong with that?
/lib/udev/rules.d/75-persistent-net-gen
Package: udev
Version: 175-7.2
Severity: normal
Dear Maintainer,
I have an virtual maschine (virtual box) with 4 network interfaces. It is
installed with the debian network ISO. I try to change the order of this
interfaces, but /etc/udev/rules.d/70-persistent-net.rules don't exist. When
I create
7 matches
Mail list logo
